Pine Forest
Posted 29/09/2008 - 07:58
Link
Nice shot, but it would be much easier to view if you restricted it to 1000 pixels. As it is some of the effect is lost by having to scroll the image from side to side.
Best regards, John
Posted 29/09/2008 - 14:40
Link
Formby Point? Nice image, I like panoramas like this, although there are a couple of errors in matching up tree trunks, especially (unfortunately) right in the middle of the pic.
Dan
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 29/09/2008 - 17:07
Link
Ahhh! I didnt see those two maj. errors!
Just looking again now I spotted some hidden amongst the dense trees
but I'm going to leave them
anyway,
thrres the corrected image
Just looking again now I spotted some hidden amongst the dense trees
but I'm going to leave them
anyway,

thrres the corrected image
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Posted 29/09/2008 - 17:58
Link
ikillrocknroll wrote:
I spotted some hidden amongst the dense trees but I'm going to leave them...
Shame on you! I spotted some hidden amongst the dense trees but I'm going to leave them...
Assuming you mean the ones top left (quarter of the way into the image).
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 29/09/2008 - 19:32
Link
Theres a few small mistakes around where the two right most trees from the front left bunch are.
those two stumps on the ground however, are meant to be there.
those two stumps on the ground however, are meant to be there.
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Posted 29/09/2008 - 23:26
Link
yeah, they looked liked stumps, so didn't mean those. Think we're talking about the same bits - seen between and to the immediate right of the two trees at the edge of the grass area front left. If that makes sense.
What focal length did you use? I tend to do my panoramas with my 50mm lens (for minimum distortion), and the camera in portrait format (for maximum height), but without a special tripod head you still end up with mis-matches with closer objects. Many of my pans are of wider views though, so I can get away with it.
Dan
What focal length did you use? I tend to do my panoramas with my 50mm lens (for minimum distortion), and the camera in portrait format (for maximum height), but without a special tripod head you still end up with mis-matches with closer objects. Many of my pans are of wider views though, so I can get away with it.
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 29/09/2008 - 23:45
Link
16mm landscape format
no idea why, usually I would use portrait format
and probably around 20mm, but that depends on the angle of view
I use Hugin, where you define the control points yourself, it usually works out exceedingly well.
no idea why, usually I would use portrait format
and probably around 20mm, but that depends on the angle of view
I use Hugin, where you define the control points yourself, it usually works out exceedingly well.
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


565 posts
18 years
North of Liverpool,
England.
Edited colours
Obviously, it used to be green.
Panorama with the 16-50.
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M