PENTAX site Check it Out
But you are right, passion is the thing.
thanks for sharing that link Ben, as I think I've said to you before your style doesn't usually appeal to me much, but I just love the one of the girl in the purple dress throwing the shoe.
all are technically great as always, just not my kind of style, but that one I really like.
Pete
Practice without talent and passion is tragic. The three together can lead anywhere. As for me, I am practising, I have a passion. Whether I have sufficient talent? My own jury is still out.
I must add one more thing: sufficient self-belief.
I must add one more thing: sufficient self-belief.
G
can professional photographers see (really see) better than amateurs? Can they really exploit the things they happen upon, the things where they don't have the control that they do in the studio?
What can they really do - with a decent camera and lens, but without the resources that being a pro gives you - that we can't?
It isn't that a gifted amateur lacks the ability of a pro - it is simply that amateurs do not have the time to spend developing the reflexes and eye for detail that good professionals must have - especially when dealing with clients who aren't interested in excuses. To develop a facility for anything you have to do it often, and there is nothing like daily commercial pressure to help develop the discipline you need to see things quickly that others may miss. This is true in any pursuit - sports for example.
I think the premise of amateurs vs pros is a little misleading sometimes because any good pro needs an amateur's heart. The problem some pros have is that photography has become just a job. The problem with some amateurs is that they lack the edge and creative reflexes of the best pros simply due to lack of daily exercise.
I should just add that studio based photographers have the most difficult job in my view because they are responsible for everything in the photograph (I can write this with a clear conscience as I am not studio based). If something is a fraction off in photo-journalism or any other field it can be excusable due to factors outside of the photographer's control. In the studio there are no excuses and nowhere to hide. Anyone who can handle studio work well has my respect.
To be successful - either as amateur, pro or semi-pro - in any creative art form I believe you need talent first, passion, then practice. Practice. Practice. Mozart was an exception, but have you seen the state of Beethoven's scores? So many crossings out and rethinks - it is painful to look at - but the results are sublime. Again, as with photography, the results, even for Beethoven, are not to everyone's taste.
Practice without talent and passion is tragic. The three together can lead anywhere. As for me, I am practising, I have a passion. Whether I have sufficient talent? My own jury is still out.
I must add one more thing: sufficient self-belief.
Ben
There's been a bit of a debate going on in other threads about Flash websites but I think yours is a great example of how it can work well.
Will
Fan and user of quality Pentax Shiny Kit
WEBSITE www.willbartonphotography.com & www.inspiredlightimages.com
Will Barton Photography: Landscapes, Cityscapes
My Flickr
Follow Will Barton Photography on Facebook
To be discerning, you need the vocabulary. Without that you are not able to even formulate the question, as it is not part of your paradigm. If you don't know something exists you cannot enter the domain. You must build the vocabulary to add to your bank of information.
Observing is the first step. This is not in a technical context. Absorb the images you are attracted to. Learn the art of discernment. Observe the "Theme" of the image. Observe the intent and how it was resolved. The technique will come as you start to define what your goals are and as a response to those projects you will seek out technical solutions. Technique is only the tool needed to achieve the final result, the expression in a concrete form.
when words fail, or contradict, it's what you do that matters. Deeds Speak.
To be discerning, you need the vocabulary. Without that you are not able to even formulate the question, as it is not part of your paradigm. If you don't know something exists you cannot enter the domain. You must build the vocabulary to add to your bank of information.
Observing is the first step. This is not in a technical context. Absorb the images you are attracted to. Learn the art of discernment. Observe the "Theme" of the image. Observe the intent and how it was resolved. The technique will come as you start to define what your goals are and as a response to those projects you will seek out technical solutions. Technique is only the tool needed to achieve the final result, the expression in a concrete form.
when words fail, or contradict, it's what you do that matters. Deeds Speak.
...however, people didn't simply float off the planet, before Newton used vocabulary to describe "Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica".
G
but having pushed a yamaha fj1200 into the 240-260 km/h speed range, having skydived, water skiing, downhill skiing, rollerblading, and list goes on and on...
I think I have a vague idea of the concepts, and have found many practical uses for gravity, and a few other laws of physics.
for example:
I don't need to read a book to know about rotational mass, gyroscoping, gravity, acceleration, aerodynamics and friction.
All I need to know is this:
If I manage to get both wheels on a 450lb, 130hp motorcycle off the ground, at the same time, what goes up will come down (gravity);
I have two wheels (large rotating masses, gyroscopes) that I can use, by braking (front and rear) or accelerating (rear) to shift the weight and level the thing off before it lands. If it lands level the weight will distribute evenly accross two different types of suspension (one being a lever, the other straight hydrolic), the tires will apply friction to the asphault, and life (the meaning of which is subjective and not likely to be found in a book) goes on.
HELL NO!
but having pushed a yamaha fj1200 into the 240-260 km/h speed range, having skydived, water skiing, downhill skiing, rollerblading, and list goes on and on...
I think I have a vague idea of the concepts, and have found many practical uses for gravity, and a few other laws of physics.
for example:
I don't need to read a book to know about rotational mass, gyroscoping, gravity, acceleration, aerodynamics and friction.
All I need to know is this:
If I manage to get both wheels on a 450lb, 130hp motorcycle off the ground, at the same time, what goes up will come down (gravity);
I have two wheels (large rotating masses, gyroscopes) that I can use, by braking (front and rear) or accelerating (rear) to shift the weight and level the thing off before it lands. If it lands level the weight will distribute evenly accross two different types of suspension (one being a lever, the other straight hydrolic), the tires will apply friction to the asphault, and life (the meaning of which is subjective and not likely to be found in a book) goes on.
G
Motorcycles, on the other hand are a religious experience.
Just hit the throttle a little harder, and the brakes a little later.
You can always buy new underwear, but how often do you get to see Jesus?
(I use him as a braking marker, to cut my lap time on the next pass)
I enjoy my photography because I can express myself better thru it than thru wordz.
Motorcycles, on the other hand are a religious experience.
Just hit the throttle a little harder, and the brakes a little later.
You can always buy new underwear, but how often do you get to see Jesus?
(I use him as a braking marker, to cut my lap time on the next pass)
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


8192 posts
22 years
London
You missed the most important factor for me, The Passion, the Joy and the Love of one of my chosen modes of expression. Without those, this discussion would be moot. As I would not exist on this forum not in this metier.
Ben
I can only think of one great artist who wasn't permanently consumed by the desire to create, and that was Rossini. Almost uniquely amongst the great composers, he retired, and took up cooking instead. Perhaps he considered cooking to be an art, but with a more practical result.
G