Pentax adverts
Posted 23/01/2010 - 22:10
Link
Posted 24/01/2010 - 13:24
Link
The writing on the uniforms reads SWAT, an american police acronym for Special Weapons and Tactics (team). I've clearly lost the power of sight since I cannot see any web address on either of the first two ads!
What is the car model BTW?
What is the car model BTW?
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 24/01/2010 - 16:12
Link
Well the photos are on a site and the site is... .com... I've no idea how it comes to Sweden.
With the photo with the woman, there is a webadress on the poster, it's Pentax.se so sweden.
Here is the information for the first two shots, don't know the market for it...
With the photo with the woman, there is a webadress on the poster, it's Pentax.se so sweden.
Here is the information for the first two shots, don't know the market for it...
Quote:
Client: Pentax
Agency: DDB Düsseldorf, Germany
Creative Directors: Thomas Schwarz & Tim Jacobs
Art Director: Thomas Schwarz
Client: Pentax
Agency: DDB Düsseldorf, Germany
Creative Directors: Thomas Schwarz & Tim Jacobs
Art Director: Thomas Schwarz
Posted 24/01/2010 - 16:36
Link
I must admit that having a second look at the first two given the comments above I realise that I missed the humour.
In the first one I just saw mlitary uniforms and people showing off their guns.
In the second I saw an image that I did not understand.
The third image was plain voyeurism.
Pehaps I am not get out enough... I must admit I tend to ignore most adverts and therfore skim them like I did with the ones you posted Stefan
Dave
In the first one I just saw mlitary uniforms and people showing off their guns.
In the second I saw an image that I did not understand.
The third image was plain voyeurism.
Pehaps I am not get out enough... I must admit I tend to ignore most adverts and therfore skim them like I did with the ones you posted Stefan
Dave
Posted 24/01/2010 - 16:56
Link
Dave an ad must get to you within a second if it didn't touch you then it failed, the trick is to make it simple and powerful.
The first two shots might have been fine but they are a bit complicated you really need to look at them, certainly the first one.
If it was a commercial on the TV the movement of the bank robbers might have stimulated your eyes so that you notice them in a second.
ps. isn't photography a type of voyeurism?
The first two shots might have been fine but they are a bit complicated you really need to look at them, certainly the first one.
If it was a commercial on the TV the movement of the bank robbers might have stimulated your eyes so that you notice them in a second.
ps. isn't photography a type of voyeurism?
Posted 24/01/2010 - 21:02
Link
That's probably why I rarely include people in my shots. I hate invading their 'space' just as I would hate mine being invaded
Dave
Dave
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



13627 posts
18 years
Hythe,
Hampshire UK
Maybe its just the Swedish having a laugh at the Americans