Pentax 645D now £4249 !!!!!!!
Seems as though the existing 645D body price has now dropped to £4249 (SRS, WEX, Clifton) - Anybody tempted ?
Part of me wants to sell off most of my kit to fund a 645D which would leave me with:-
K-3 & F*250-600mm for wildlife
645D & 55mm for landscapes etc.
Just not sure if I've got the balls to sell off my entire lens collection though! It makes a lot of sense from a quality / selling prints perspective and it really would help me focus as I'd never have to wonder what lens to take with me etc. It's definately doable, just don't know if it's something I might regret!
Would any of you in my position take the plunge? Would be interested in any thoughts!
If we like Pentax images, then the 645D is the clear choice.
Is it a good choice for Unlocker? That's not really for anyone else to say, it's a very personal decision. It wouldn't make sense for me to end up with the proposed kit, but it might or might not for Unlocker.
... It makes a lot of sense from a quality / selling prints perspective and it really would help me focus as I'd never have to wonder what lens to take with me etc. It's definately doable, just don't know if it's something I might regret!
Would any of you in my position take the plunge? Would be interested in any thoughts!
....does the 645D give you that much over the Nikon D800 ....
It's not really ideal for sports or low light photography (high ISO), but landscapes, studio, portraits, weddings, etc. I think it will hold its head high for a good few years to come.
We often hear the argument that full frame doesn't give you much over the K3. Fair argument I think. By the same token does the 645D give you that much over the Nikon D800 (sorry would like to quote a Pentax model, obviously can't)? Does the later generation sensor narrow the gap significantly or is the substantial cost difference still justified?
If i had the funds I would buy medium format tomorrow, certainly would be of more use and interest to me than FF.
Back in film days there was a real quality advantage for MF over 35mm offsetting (for some) the weight and cost of MF. As film technology improved that advantage continued as the MF camera could, in principle, share the same film types as 35mm.
But in digital technology marches on and it is only a question of time until the quality benefit from that MF sensor is overtaken by improved FF sensors, and then by improved APSC sensors and you need to reinvest. So if you want MF for quality reasons I conclude you need very deep pockets to not only buy it in the first place to to keep updating it to maintain that quality advantage over FF/APSC.
If you are a professional and the motive is increased sales from the higher quality then I guess the equation is different i.e. can you earn sufficient extra money from the higher quality MF investment before it ceases to offer higher sales.
I'm enjoying going down the smaller mirrorless, rather than bigger full frame/mf route. All depends how you shoot though.
P.S. If anyone does get one I will be jealous.
I would also have to say that if I were looking at that sort of resolution I would buy the Nikon D800E or the new Sony.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
7028 posts
17 years
Worcestershire