Pagham

swarf
Posted 20/01/2018 - 13:39 Link
A few from a recent shoot at Pagham (W.Sussex). All shot with the K-5iis.

1) Pagham tidal pool, shot with a Vivitar 28mm F2.8 MC Close Focus (A) that I bought in the mid 1970s, and a grad ND filter

Comment Image


2) Rocks & Groynes, shot with Pentax HD DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED WR & Haida 10 stop ND filter

Comment Image


3) Pagham Rocks, shot with Pentax DA* 16-50 & Haida 10 stop ND filter; converted in Silver Efex Pro 2

Comment Image


4) Pagham Rocks, shot with Pentax DA* 16-50 & Haida 10 stop ND filter + Cokin Grad ND filter

Comment Image


5) Pagham Rocks, shot with Pentax DA* 16-50 & Haida 10 stop ND filter + Cokin Grad ND filter + Lee Coral Grad Filter

Comment Image


All comments and suggestions gratefully received.

Phil
K-5iiS; K-r; ME Super; ME; DA* 16-50 f2.8; DA 18-135 WR; DA 55-300 WR; HD DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited; FA 50mm f1.4; A50mm f1.7; DAL 18-55mm; M40mm f2.8; + assorted non-Pentax lenses

My Flikr Page link
Chrism8
Posted 20/01/2018 - 14:04 Link
Not been near Pagham for ages, really like #3 thou
Chris

www.chrismillsphotography.co.uk

" A Hangover is something that occupies the Head you neglected to use the night before".

-------------------------------------------------------------
K1 - Sigma 85mm F1.4, Pentax DFA 150 -450 F4.5 / 5.6, Pentax DFA* 24 - 70 F2.8

Samyang 14mm F2.8, Pentax DFA* 70-200 F2.8, Pentax A 50mm F1.2

K3iii + K3ii + K5iis converted to IR, Sigma 17 - 70 F2.8, Pentax 55 - 300 F4.5 / F5.6 PLM
alfpics
Posted 20/01/2018 - 15:12 Link
I was 'around the corner' at west Wittering yesterday - we had somewhat brighter weather (As in a fairly clear sky for a good part of the day! Like Chris, number 3 is my favourite - a good b&w tonal range and balance of sky and sea with foreground interest with the groyne
Andy
pschlute
Posted 20/01/2018 - 15:36 Link
I like no. 3 the best, good detail in the clouds. Although i would be inclined to crop or clone out the pole on the left.
Chrism8
Posted 20/01/2018 - 17:25 Link
I think u should keep the pole
Chris

www.chrismillsphotography.co.uk

" A Hangover is something that occupies the Head you neglected to use the night before".

-------------------------------------------------------------
K1 - Sigma 85mm F1.4, Pentax DFA 150 -450 F4.5 / 5.6, Pentax DFA* 24 - 70 F2.8

Samyang 14mm F2.8, Pentax DFA* 70-200 F2.8, Pentax A 50mm F1.2

K3iii + K3ii + K5iis converted to IR, Sigma 17 - 70 F2.8, Pentax 55 - 300 F4.5 / F5.6 PLM
pschlute
Posted 20/01/2018 - 18:16 Link
Chrism8 wrote:
I think u should keep the pole
"To pole or not to pole", that is the question !
swarf
Posted 20/01/2018 - 19:01 Link
Apparently the pole marks the remains of one of the Mulberry Harbour elements from the war. That's one reason why I kept it in, the second was that the rocks formed a perfect 'lead in line' to it. But as Peter notes - "to pole or not to pole...?"

However, I'm pleased that you like the conversion.

Phil
K-5iiS; K-r; ME Super; ME; DA* 16-50 f2.8; DA 18-135 WR; DA 55-300 WR; HD DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited; FA 50mm f1.4; A50mm f1.7; DAL 18-55mm; M40mm f2.8; + assorted non-Pentax lenses

My Flikr Page link
Kevriano
Posted 20/01/2018 - 21:44 Link
Very nice set indeed.
K3, K3 II, 100MM 2.8 Macro, Sigma 10-20 3.5, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Nikon D7500, Tamron 150 600 G2
McGregNi
Posted 21/01/2018 - 18:30 Link
There are some nice muted colour tones here, in fact the colour ones are almost monochrome! It adds a certain serenity which goes well with the location and time of year.

I do notice you tend to chop things off ....eg the groynes and rows of rocks. I'm sure this is you working to isolate elements within the scene, and concentrate attention. However I do wonder if the compositions would be stronger with a wider sweep and allowing the full lines of objects to be within the frame .....?
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
swarf
Posted 21/01/2018 - 19:29 Link
McGregNi wrote:
There are some nice muted colour tones here, in fact the colour ones are almost monochrome! It adds a certain serenity which goes well with the location and time of year.

I do notice you tend to chop things off ....eg the groynes and rows of rocks. I'm sure this is you working to isolate elements within the scene, and concentrate attention. However I do wonder if the compositions would be stronger with a wider sweep and allowing the full lines of objects to be within the frame .....?
Neil

Thanks for your observations.

There are a variety of reasons why I have done this with these images, but the principle one was that the foreground was rather uninteresting shingle. As a result I cropped to give either a (strongish) lead-in line, or to put the horizon at a level that was pleasing to my eye.

The limited tonal range was also something I was going after, and I have others from the same shoot where this is probably even more pronounced. This is something that I'm still just playing with as I have previously tended towards much more saturated colours.

Phil
K-5iiS; K-r; ME Super; ME; DA* 16-50 f2.8; DA 18-135 WR; DA 55-300 WR; HD DA 15mm F4 ED AL Limited; FA 50mm f1.4; A50mm f1.7; DAL 18-55mm; M40mm f2.8; + assorted non-Pentax lenses

My Flikr Page link
razashaikh
Posted 22/01/2018 - 04:16 Link
That's a stunning set of pictures.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo