Opinions on focus comparison please

judderman62
Posted 29/12/2011 - 23:25 Link
Hi Guys

I posted on this thread about having some concerns on my K5's autofocus and said I would post some pics so this is the thread for that.

I was out yesterday and took the same scene with 2 cameras.

Both using standard 18-55 kit lens, both ISO 100, both 6 seconds exposure at f10 fired with cable release tripod mounted.

Took 1st shot and then swapped straight over

One shot with the Pentax K5 the other with Canon rebel whatever the equiv is to the 500D

Now neither is perfect in original size shot but I do think one is a little clearer than the other.

i would appreciate any feedback, opinions, advice please.
I'll post links to the original size:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/84462488@N00/6596842069/sizes/o/in/photostream/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/84462488@N00/6596839663/sizes/o/in/photostream/

here's the image in medium size:
Comment Image


I used a focus point around the ear area.

will be grateful for honest unbiased !!!! feedback.

thanks in advance all

Mike
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Edited by judderman62: 29/12/2011 - 23:41
davidstorm
Posted 29/12/2011 - 23:40 - Helpful Comment Link
Second one is definitely better IMHO.

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
johnriley
Posted 29/12/2011 - 23:42 Link
Unfortunately it's a very inconclusive test and I'm not sure the subject is a good one.

The two cameras (both on JPEG or RAW?) give different exposures and the quality of the two is certainly different. Is this due to the lenses, the JPEG settings, the degree of sharpening needed in Photoshop? We don't know.

The idea of a focus test is to establish that the camera is focusing on a point, not in front or behind it. This needs a subject where we have definable sharpness from near to far away and focus on a point in the middle. A diagonal row of dominoes would do it, or posts, or a ruler at 45 degrees to the camera. Or a test target.

As it stands, your image is at a small aperture, so depth of field should cover huge focusing errors. Try a diagonal target at the widest aperture and see where the point of focus is.
Best regards, John
judderman62
Posted 29/12/2011 - 23:44 Link
to answer a couple of those questions I always shoot RAW and processing was identical.
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
johnriley
Posted 29/12/2011 - 23:53 Link
You don't need a second camera to do a focus test. Just use the one you are testing and the 45 degree subject will reveal where it is focusing.
Best regards, John
Pentaxophile
Posted 30/12/2011 - 12:02 - Helpful Comment Link
Well... we can see the photos and we can see something is wrong. That's a conclusion we can draw without reference to test charts etc...

I presume you've turned SR off for the long exposure?

The first image is OOF but seems less so in the left hand corner, perhaps.

The wall there is closer than the ear area, so perhaps the lens is front focusing? Try again using AF in live view. If results are better, you know the lens is front or back focussing wildly. If not, it's something else....

This will not be the 'FF in tungsten light issue' IMO, and more likely a front or back focusing kit lens. Or it may be that the lens has been doinked in transit and needs replacing by Mr. SRS. To be sure, try a different lens!

I really, really doubt this has anything to do with the camera body itself, in either case.
Edited by Pentaxophile: 30/12/2011 - 12:23
judderman62
Posted 30/12/2011 - 12:17 Link
brilliant - thanks very much for that. To be honest thinking about it I'm pretty sure I did NOT turn off SR (Doh !!!!)

I'll try a few more and also do the comparison you suggest of live view v normal.

Was quite disappointed with the results from both cameras to be honest - doesn't seem to me like a scene that should cause issues for a DSLR The Canon shot is a little clearer but still hardly spot on

Thanks again folks
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Pentaxophile
Posted 30/12/2011 - 12:28 - Helpful Comment Link
The Canon looks OK to me, considering it's the kit lens. Nothing a quick sharpen in PP wouldn't fix! When your Pentax set up is working properly, the same will be true.
judderman62
Posted 30/12/2011 - 12:35 Link
thanks Sir
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
fatspider
Posted 30/12/2011 - 12:53 Link
You said both were processed in exactly the same way, I would be surprised if RAW files from different models let alone different brands would require exactly the same process settings.

For a fair comparison test you would need to use a same model third party lens on each camera, even then you may have a discrepancy in each lens.

Having said that I have to admit that your test shows the Canon kit lens is producing superior shots to the Pentax, maybe you have a duff copy of the Pentax lens?
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
judderman62
Posted 30/12/2011 - 13:02 Link
see I didn't know that shows how little I know about digital photography

I've just set up presets in lightroom as recommended in a book by Scott Kelby (meant to be a bit of a lightroom guru) and always just use those.

have to admit to being pretty clueless when it comes to processing - maybe I should go back to jpeg
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2
Pentaxophile
Posted 30/12/2011 - 13:27 - Helpful Comment Link
judderman62 wrote:
see I didn't know that shows how little I know about digital photography (
I wouldn't get hung up on that. Your concern is the gross lack of sharpness, not minor differences in tone and colour. You can twiddle about with the Pentax files to make them look just like the Canon files and vice versa but this is beside the point really. (After setting up the presets, it's over to you to make adjustments according to your own taste and your intentions for the image)
fatspider
Posted 30/12/2011 - 13:34 - Helpful Comment Link
Quote:
maybe I should go back to jpeg
There is nothing wrong with jpeg, 99% of my "finished" images are from jpeg although I have got into the habit of shooting RAW+, then if the exposure on the jpeg is iffy I can correct it in the RAW file.
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
Pentaxophile
Posted 30/12/2011 - 13:37 - Helpful Comment Link
Yep and jpeg would make more sense for these sort of 'testing' shots as it's quicker to deal with.
judderman62
Posted 30/12/2011 - 13:38 Link
I just like the idea of being able to change the WB after the event - very useful indeed . also there is more scope for tweaking with raw files
- -
Mike

Pentax K5 / Pentax K5 11/ Pentax K200D / Canon Rebel T1 i / Canon 650D / Pentax MX-1 / Fuji XF1 /Fuji X 10 / Canon EOS-M / Canon G10/ Pentax Mz-7 x 2

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo