One for Clarky . . .

Mannesty
Posted 21/09/2008 - 22:26 Link
I shot this today, natural light, tripod mounted K20D + FA 100mm Macro . . .

Comment Image

Question to all: What would you do with the background to improve this pic?. The beige colour is my front (coloured concrete) wall. The plant is a Lantana, the victim, a bee. The spider . . . I have no clue.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Edited by Mannesty: 21/09/2008 - 22:26
hefty1
Posted 21/09/2008 - 22:38 Link
I've got a selection of A3 sheets in every colour of the rainbow courtesy of my local art supplies / craft shop. They only cost a few pence each and I often use them as backdrops, just slide them behind the subject and the job's done! In fact they're one of my most-used photographic accessories.

To change the background in post production is possible in Photoshop, but it's fiddly and rarely looks 100% convincing unfortunately. Shame, other than the mass of beige it's a great picture. I'm not a big fan of black and white usually but maybe a mono conversion would help here?
Joining the Q
terje-l
Posted 21/09/2008 - 22:59 Link
I cannot see what's wrong with this picture at all. The beige background makes the subject stand out in all its glory (or should I say horror).

I would say Mannesty gives Clarky a tough competition here...
Best regards
Terry

K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
royd63uk
Posted 21/09/2008 - 23:14 Link
I agree with Terje

I cant see anything wrong with the shot at all the background is fine.
Spider i think is a variety of crab spider,they hide whithin the flower petals awaiting their prey.
Nice

Roy
regards
Roy

Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/

my pbase gallery
Mannesty
Posted 21/09/2008 - 23:16 Link
Hefty1: I'll try a white background tomorrow if the spider is still around after the deluge of rain we've had tonight. I think it needs a light background. If I use a black (or dark) background, the hairs on it's legs will not show up so much. Changing the background colour in Photoshop is not going to work without an awful lot of work.

Terje-l: Thanks for your comments. In contrast to Clarky, I've spent a shed load of money on macro lighting equipment . . . and I didn't even use it today. I had the sun very low, and just over my left shoulder when I took this. Hence the bright spots on the bee's body. I took one later with just the pop-up flash and it's not in the same league as natural sunshine.

royd63k: It was certainly waiting around the flower for its prey. After it had finished with the bee, it had a go at a wasp . . . but missed. I'd put the camera away by then though.

In the light of your various comments, I'll leave this one as it is and have another go at taking the shot with a different background, probably white, tomorrow.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Edited by Mannesty: 22/09/2008 - 00:10
Clarky
Posted 22/09/2008 - 01:45 Link
Great shot Pete, It would have been better with a slightly darker background but it looks good as is so just leave it.

I like how you got it all in focus, it can be a challenge.

I think its a type of Lynx spider, going by its flat face and the shape of its carapace (rear end) Well done keep em coming
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Mannesty
Posted 22/09/2008 - 07:49 Link
Clarky wrote:
Great shot Pete, It would have been better with a slightly darker background but it looks good as is so just leave it.

I like how you got it all in focus, it can be a challenge.

I think its a type of Lynx spider, going by its flat face and the shape of its carapace (rear end) Well done keep em coming
Thanks Clarky.

If I might make a small correction though, the carapace is what covers the front (cephalothorax) body component of a spider. The rear is its abdomen.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Clarky
Posted 22/09/2008 - 08:43 Link
Mannesty wrote:
Clarky wrote:
Great shot Pete, It would have been better with a slightly darker background but it looks good as is so just leave it.

I like how you got it all in focus, it can be a challenge.

I think its a type of Lynx spider, going by its flat face and the shape of its carapace (rear end) Well done keep em coming
Thanks Clarky.

If I might make a small correction though, the carapace is what covers the front (cephalothorax) body component of a spider. The rear is its abdomen.
oops, your right, but I wasn't far off was I
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
fatspider
Posted 22/09/2008 - 09:16 Link
Nice shot Peter, nothing wrong with the background, I'm really envious, almost as green as the spider
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo