One "all-in-one" lens for beginner

Garnett
Posted 17/05/2012 - 23:25 Link
I'm wondering about keeping the kit lens, getting the cheapo 50-200mm and then using them until I get a feel for what I like.

Today I could have done with a 35mm f2.4
~Pentax K-5, DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AL WR, DA 35mm f/2.4 AL, DA 55-300mm f4.0-5.8 ED, FA 50mm f/1.4, M 50mm f/1.8 - flickr
johnriley
Posted 17/05/2012 - 23:33 Link
What you have in mind is a perfectly viable option. Eventually you will know where your photography is headed and that's the time perhaps to be thinking of more specialised lenses.
Best regards, John
Smeggypants
Posted 18/05/2012 - 00:34 Link
ChrisA wrote:

My only Sigmas are a 10-20 (earlier version) and a recent 50-500.
I don't have either of those. 30/1.4, 17-70and 135-400 here.

Quote:

I'd say the colours render a little cooler on both of them than on my Pentax lenses.

It's not a huge effect, and I do find it surprising that it's even noticeable. The lenses are supposed to be transparent, after all
... I nearly bought a 10-20 though.

Next Sigma I get will probably be the 85/1.4
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
gunner
Posted 25/05/2012 - 10:15 Link
For a one lens solution, I don't think you can beat the Pentax 18-250. I've had one for a couple of years and it's still my 'go to' lens.

Apart from sports/wildlife, the range should never be a limiting factor and you can decide where in that range you might want to invest when the time comes for something faster - in my view speed is the major gap in the 18-250's repertoire.
wadna
Posted 26/05/2012 - 01:20 Link
greynolds999 wrote:
My advice for a novice is to buy a 50mm and nothing else. You will learn more about photography with a single fixed-focus lens. It will teach you how to 'find' a photograph by walking around a subject rather than standing in the same spot and zooming in.

I'm not saying that zooms are bad, but I don't think you will learn as much with one on.

But if you want a camera to take on holiday and take snaps with better quality than a point and shoot, then the 18-250 is a pretty good lens.
My thoughts entirely except that for APS-C I would suggest the DA35 (or the FA31, if you can afford it) as it is closer to "normal". The time I spent with the Spotmatic & 50/1.8 (after I got over crappy zooms) was the best training I could have had.
fatspider
Posted 26/05/2012 - 01:27 Link
wadna wrote:
greynolds999 wrote:
My advice for a novice is to buy a 50mm and nothing else. You will learn more about photography with a single fixed-focus lens. It will teach you how to 'find' a photograph by walking around a subject rather than standing in the same spot and zooming in.

I'm not saying that zooms are bad, but I don't think you will learn as much with one on.

But if you want a camera to take on holiday and take snaps with better quality than a point and shoot, then the 18-250 is a pretty good lens.
My thoughts entirely except that for APS-C I would suggest the DA35 (or the FA31, if you can afford it) as it is closer to "normal". The time I spent with the Spotmatic & 50/1.8 (after I got over crappy zooms) was the best training I could have had.
I wondered when someone would spot that
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
Edited by fatspider: 26/05/2012 - 01:27

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo