Not a plane

George Lazarette
Posted 18/09/2009 - 23:39 Link
Just for a change, this flies but it's not a plane.
Comment Image


Only nice comments please.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
pschlute
Posted 19/09/2009 - 00:01 Link
Stunning capture George.
George Lazarette
Posted 19/09/2009 - 00:35 Link
Thanks, Peter. This was cheating. Water birds will often let you get very close when you're on a narrowboat.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
pschlute
Posted 19/09/2009 - 00:43 Link
That explains it. I was wondering how you captured that with a 210mm
George Lazarette
Posted 19/09/2009 - 01:00 Link
pschlute wrote:
That explains it. I was wondering how you captured that with a 210mm
Years of practice.
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
fatspider
Posted 19/09/2009 - 07:31 Link
Quote:
Only nice comments please.
OK then....

I really like the artistic approach to leaving the dirt showing from the sensor and also the sublime way that hot pixel in the right wing adds interest to an otherwise dark area, I also love the way you have cropped in on this to emphasise the noise in the grass.

HOWEVER what were you thinking in allowing those wings to blur and show the gracefull movement of this magnificent creature
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
PeteL
Posted 19/09/2009 - 08:55 Link
In addition to impotentspiders comments, The dark area of sky on the right hand edge of frame would benefit from some attention too. But having got that out of the way..... What a great image, Well done!

Regards-Pete
SteveT
Posted 19/09/2009 - 09:24 Link
Also looks to me as though its had some cloning done on the horizon around the head / beak area perhaps to remove a stray tree or bush which would have lessened the impact?
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
Hardgravity
Posted 19/09/2009 - 09:51 Link
Ignore them George, they're only jealous!

The only other heron I've seen in the UK was a DeHavilland one.
Cheers, HG

K110+DA40, K200+DA35, K3 and a bag of lenses, bodies and other bits.

Mustn't forget the Zenits, or folders, or...

PPG entries.
ChrisA
Posted 19/09/2009 - 10:15 Link
George Lazarette wrote:
Only nice comments please.
Ok, here's one...

I think this picture is good enough to be well worth having another go at the cloning in the area around the head, possibly on a brighter monitor than it was done on originally.

There's no other explanation I can see, than simply that the monitor couldn't show the obvious difference in the blue of the sky, and the blue under the beak, or indeed the 'shockwaves' in the air above it.

Seriously - I edited a lot of my early K10D pictures on an old CRT monitor, and was truly shocked when I saw them on the LCD that I use now.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
PeteL
Posted 19/09/2009 - 10:17 Link
Hardgravity wrote:
Ignore them George, they're only jealous!

The only other heron I've seen in the UK was a DeHavilland one.
Ahhh De Havllland!!!



I have never seen a D H Heron but i Painted R A F Cosford`s Devon (The Herons Baby Brother)about 12 years ago and we had our tea breaks in the cabin!

Regards - Pete.
George Lazarette
Posted 19/09/2009 - 10:21 Link
As some people know, I seldom do any post-processing apart from what Silkypix allows, so I'm not much good at it! In this case I did remove (very badly) some bushes behind the head, but I didn't get as far as dealing with sensor dust and the bush on the right. When I get Silkypix Pro I'll try and clean it up a little.

Was the hot pixel comment a joke? I can't see it. But then, my eyes are old, and anyway the *ist D is long gone.

Thanks for all the comments.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
George Lazarette
Posted 19/09/2009 - 10:25 Link
ChrisA wrote:
George Lazarette wrote:
Only nice comments please.
Ok, here's one...

I think this picture is good enough to be well worth having another go at the cloning in the area around the head, possibly on a brighter monitor than it was done on originally.

There's no other explanation I can see, than simply that the monitor couldn't show the obvious difference in the blue of the sky, and the blue under the beak, or indeed the 'shockwaves' in the air above it.

Seriously - I edited a lot of my early K10D pictures on an old CRT monitor, and was truly shocked when I saw them on the LCD that I use now.
You're absolutely right, Chris. This was "done" on a pretty nasty old CRT monitor, and I thought it looked worse than I remembered. As said, I'll have another go at it.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
pschlute
Posted 19/09/2009 - 10:25 Link
George

I highly recomend the Silkypix pro. The spotting tool deals with dust spots and other cloning very effectively and easily. I now rarely need to save as a tiff first to do this kind of editing in photoshop before saving a jpeg.
Dr. Mhuni
Posted 19/09/2009 - 10:33 Link
[quote:Was the hot pixel comment a joke? I can't see it. But then, my eyes are old, and anyway the *ist D is long gone.
[/quote]Nope, the hot pixel's definitely there. Can even see it on my laptop screen (still not got round to getting a desktop monitor - partly because all I've found so far are bog standard ones in Colombo).

On a more positive note... I rather like the noise!

By the way, what lens was used?
Mhuni

500px

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo