Northern lights

Posted 30/11/2025 - 12:45 Link
In Manchester last week

Pentax KP with DA 16-45mm

C&C welcome

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image
Adam

Flickr
rick
Posted 30/11/2025 - 15:48 Link
Looks like the DA 16-45mm has delivered some nice results for you, great clarity.

Did you find the the 16mm end wide enough for you in the end for your trip, know you were considering wider at one point?

Rick
Adapting Pentax-M Series Lenses
Posted 30/11/2025 - 16:19 Link
rick wrote:
Looks like the DA 16-45mm has delivered some nice results for you, great clarity.

Did you find the the 16mm end wide enough for you in the end for your trip, know you were considering wider at one point?

Rick
Yes, 16mm was plenty wide for me.
The lens is very sharp
Just unfortunate that i don't like the grainy effects produced by the KP at high ISO so most of my library/cathedral shots have been discarded.
I did however get plenty of keepers so more to come soon
Adam

Flickr
rick
Posted 30/11/2025 - 16:37 - Helpful Comment Link
I don't like to be above ISO 800 because of digital noise/grain. Often times it can be smoothed out with noise reduction software, but still that can have an unnatural appearance. Not that I shoot dark environment often, I'd prefer to go for the long exposure and ISO 100/200, but I know carrying around a tripod is a pain (especially when you're just on your travels), most of the time I go for a pocket-able mini tripod and hope there's a suitable location to sit it on... or give up on the shot all together.
Adapting Pentax-M Series Lenses
Posted 30/11/2025 - 16:44 Link
rick wrote:
I don't like to be above ISO 800 because of digital noise/grain. Often times it can be smoothed out with noise reduction software, but still that can have an unnatural appearance. Not that I shoot dark environment often, I'd prefer to go for the long exposure and ISO 100/200, but I know carrying around a tripod is a pain (especially when you're just on your travels), most of the time I go for a pocket-able mini tripod and hope there's a suitable location to sit it on... or give up on the shot all together.
Truth be told, I was underwhelmed/disappointed with both the library and the cathedral so didn't actually take that many images.
Adam

Flickr
SSF1957
Posted 01/12/2025 - 07:49 Link
Nice set Adam. That lens has really delivered
Stephen

645Z, K1, K1ii, K3iii + mono, K3ii, K3,KP, K-S1, K200D,K10D, K-r, Ist* DL, Ist* D, QS-1 plus too many film bodies !
Flickr Page
Photocrowd Page
Posted 01/12/2025 - 08:57 Link
SSF1957 wrote:
Nice set Adam. That lens has really delivered
Thanks very much Stephen
Adam

Flickr
walkeja
Posted 01/12/2025 - 10:39 Link
Very whitty
Pentax K1-ii and MZ6
Pentax Lenses 28-80 F, 300 DA*, 80-200 F, 35 F2.4 AL, M50 F1.7, 28-105 DFA, 20 F4 SMC
ONE UNITED Member
Posted 01/12/2025 - 10:49 Link
walkeja wrote:
Very whitty
Thanks 😃
Adam

Flickr
davidwozhere
Posted 02/12/2025 - 00:11 - Helpful Comment Link
Amazing installation and nice shots of it. I think the bright sky got the better of the last one however. Had the exposure been dialed up a few EV it would have given you a longer open shutter time.
Both the *istDS and the K5 are incurably addicted to old glass

My page on Photocrowd
richandfleur
Posted 02/12/2025 - 02:32 Link
rick wrote:
I don't like to be above ISO 800 because of digital noise/grain.
Is that on the KP you're referring to?
I thought the KP had the accelerator (?) chip to help with high ISO shots/noise?

I'm still using the original K-3 and cap iso at 3200 on that, and ideally shoot below 1600. I know can be different between people but I'd hoped the KP would be much better than that.

Noise reduction on the very latest lightroom is really good now, and you can dial it up or down to suit - avoiding the fake aspect you mention when overdone. It's so capable these days I think higher ISO performance, once the standard go to feature of each new model release, is not as important any more.
Posted 02/12/2025 - 05:22 Link
davidwozhere wrote:
Amazing installation and nice shots of it. I think the bright sky got the better of the last one however. Had the exposure been dialed up a few EV it would have given you a longer open shutter time.
Thank you
Adam

Flickr
Posted 02/12/2025 - 05:26 Link
richandfleur wrote:
rick wrote:
I don't like to be above ISO 800 because of digital noise/grain.
Is that on the KP you're referring to?
I thought the KP had the accelerator (?) chip to help with high ISO shots/noise?

I'm still using the original K-3 and cap iso at 3200 on that, and ideally shoot below 1600. I know can be different between people but I'd hoped the KP would be much better than that.

Noise reduction on the very latest lightroom is really good now, and you can dial it up or down to suit - avoiding the fake aspect you mention when overdone. It's so capable these days I think higher ISO performance, once the standard go to feature of each new model release, is not as important any more.
Yes it is the KP and yes it is supposed to be great at high ISO
But not in my experience with it
Maybe it is me
But I also choose not to PP 9% of the time other than cropping/straightening
Adam

Flickr

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo