noisy

GivingTree
Posted 20/06/2009 - 21:17 Link
Took my Sigma 70-300 to the air station in Pensacola for a Blue Angels practice session. Last year I didn't have it and wanted to see how I fared with it.

I thought I would love this one, then I saw it on my monitor and it's NOISY. Didn't realize noise would be an issue on a bright morning. ISO is 800, should I have taken it down? (I bumped it to 800 because I knew I'd be shooting mostly at 300mm and wanted to get crisp shots)

Comment Image


This one is really the only one from the day that is so noisy, but it's a shame. BTW, this is only a slight crop.
What would you have done different?
"Just put your eye to the camera and push the button-thingy."
Flickr page:
link
ttk
Posted 20/06/2009 - 21:25 Link
Nothing lost download a 30 day trial of Noise Ninja or Neat Image and run the Image through on the default settings, job done.
Tel,
scottthehat
Posted 20/06/2009 - 22:16 Link
what camera, and the noise suprises me, but it looks ok gone,
[IMG]http://i727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/IMGP6492.jpg[/IMG]
just keep snapping,

https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson


http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/


CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
hefty1
Posted 20/06/2009 - 22:41 Link
Personally I'd rather have a sharp shot that's noisy than a smooth shot that's blurred - it's all a bit of a trade off like most things in photography.

As Scott's shown above you can eliminate the noise in PP easily enough, but if the picture's strong then I never tend to notice noise anyway - I certainly don't find it offensive. It's a personal taste thing I reckon.

Great capture by the way!
Joining the Q
haydnw
Posted 20/06/2009 - 22:44 Link
Scott,

Noise Ninja certainly does a great job of reducing the noise but has left a white 'Halo' around the plane.

Is this effect avoidable or an inevitable result of the noise reduction process ??
Haydn

link
Samsung GX1S, Nikon D300, Zenith 12XP, Olympus OM10, Holga 120N
Mike-P
Posted 20/06/2009 - 22:47 Link
haydnw wrote:
Scott,

Noise Ninja certainly does a great job of reducing the noise but has left a white 'Halo' around the plane.

Is this effect avoidable or an inevitable result of the noise reduction process ??
It would work better with the full size jpeg, I am presuming Scott used it on the small one here.
jackitec
Posted 20/06/2009 - 23:16 Link
Here is my shot at it Crackin shot by the way

[IMG]http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq253/jackitec/Image1-1.jpg[/IMG]
Edited by jackitec: 20/06/2009 - 23:17
GivingTree
Posted 21/06/2009 - 05:07 Link
Ok, that does make a difference! I'll be downloading it right off.

Thanks for the examples of what a noise reduction program can do.

EDIT: I use the K100ds.
"Just put your eye to the camera and push the button-thingy."
Flickr page:
link
Edited by GivingTree: 21/06/2009 - 05:10
ttk
Posted 21/06/2009 - 10:02 Link
jackitec wrote:
Here is my shot at it Crackin shot by the way

[IMG]http://i453.photobucket.com/albums/qq253/jackitec/Image1-1.jpg[/IMG]
Was this on default settings Mike?




Edit: Added Word.
Tel,
Edited by ttk: 21/06/2009 - 10:03
scottthehat
Posted 21/06/2009 - 10:33 Link
haydnw wrote:
Scott,

Noise Ninja certainly does a great job of reducing the noise but has left a white 'Halo' around the plane.

Is this effect avoidable or an inevitable result of the noise reduction process ??
Mike-P wrote:
haydnw wrote:
Scott,

Noise Ninja certainly does a great job of reducing the noise but has left a white 'Halo' around the plane.

Is this effect avoidable or an inevitable result of the noise reduction process ??
It would work better with the full size jpeg, I am presuming Scott used it on the small one here.
mike is right it would be better with the original, i used the small one posted,
just keep snapping,

https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson


http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/


CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
davidtrout
Posted 21/06/2009 - 21:49 Link
It was a cracking shot to start with Emily so don't get hung up on the noise issue. As Hefty said, better to have a noisy shot than an unsharp one. But the guys have shown that noise reduction is possible in PS with more than one method. Personally I shoot everything in RAW these days and for higher ISO ratings I use the RAW noise reduction which helps.
At the end of the day you have s super action picture here, noisy or not.
david

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo