NG15 (five shots, reduced in size)
Posted 03/11/2010 - 06:21
Link
Your customary quality series Andrew, eminently viewable!
Posted 03/11/2010 - 08:45
Link
Thanks both.
aliengrove wrote:
...a master of delapidated detail!
I might ask to have that etched into my tomb-stone! I must post some more aesthetically pretty shots...to redress the balance.
...a master of delapidated detail!
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 03/11/2010 - 08:48
Link
You done some very pleasant looking shots in some well-groomed gardens and posh houses too Andrew don't forget! I wouldn't hurry unduly trying to get away from the industrial era.
Posted 03/11/2010 - 09:08
Link
5 and 3 for me amazing shots Andrew I for some reason really like no 5
David
David
All the best
David
David
Posted 03/11/2010 - 13:05
Link
There all good. I like 3 for the contrast between the plant and the rusting metal. How about a tight crop to include just the plant and the round thing?
David
David
K20D, Pentax 18-55AL II, Pentax-A 28mm f2.8, Pentax-M 50mm f1.7 (fabulous lens!), Pentax-m 100mm f4, Domiplan 50mm 2.8 M42, Lydith 30mm 3.5 M42 (10 blade iris!).
Flikr
Flikr
Posted 03/11/2010 - 19:14
Link
i-Berg wrote:
I wouldn't hurry unduly trying to get away from the industrial era.
Thanks i-Berg. No chance of this, I'm afraid. I studied the 19th century for A-level (not long after its conclusion, actually) and it's been a favourite period of mine ever since.I wouldn't hurry unduly trying to get away from the industrial era.
pianoman wrote:
I for some reason really like no 5
David
Thanks. And to think I nearly didn't include that one!I for some reason really like no 5
David
DRM098 wrote:
How about a tight crop to include just the plant and the round thing?
David
Like this, you mean, David?How about a tight crop to include just the plant and the round thing?
David
[IMG]http://i927.photobucket.com/albums/ad116/ADC3440/Pictures142.jpg[/IMG]
I like the tight, square(ish) composition but miss the splash of oily colour to the right. Not sure which is "best".
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 03/11/2010 - 19:35
Link
Andrew lovely set again.
I really like how you're able to capture the textures.
About the last edited photo, i prefer the original one, the edited one seems too closed up/restrictive (can't find the word i'm looking for :blush
I really like how you're able to capture the textures.
About the last edited photo, i prefer the original one, the edited one seems too closed up/restrictive (can't find the word i'm looking for :blush
Posted 03/11/2010 - 20:32
Link
Anvh wrote:
I really like how you're able to capture the textures.
:blush
Thanks Stefan, "tight" would probably do in this context, and you may be right.I really like how you're able to capture the textures.
:blush
As for "how", I don't know, really, it's just decent (not brilliant, in this case) light; a good (but again, not "great") lens; moderate apertures (I don't push my luck with very small or very large apertures on my modest lenses); in-camera shake reduction (too lazy to use a tripod most of the time and the places I go are often too awkward to set one up) and my wonderful camera, of course!
Sorry, this is not very helpful. I'm certainly not gifted like Robert Mapplethorpe (in any sense!!!)
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Posted 03/11/2010 - 22:39
Link
Having seen the tight crop I'm not so sure now! The original gives some sort of context I think. Interesting to compare though, thanks.
David
David
K20D, Pentax 18-55AL II, Pentax-A 28mm f2.8, Pentax-M 50mm f1.7 (fabulous lens!), Pentax-m 100mm f4, Domiplan 50mm 2.8 M42, Lydith 30mm 3.5 M42 (10 blade iris!).
Flikr
Flikr
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



2523 posts
16 years
Here,
there,
everywhere
Great work!
My Website
PPG
flickr
G+
Facebook