New Lens

Ratcatcher
Posted 18/08/2023 - 10:20 Link
I'm Looking at getting a new lens in the 16/17- 50/70 F 2.8 range.
Your thoughts would be most welcome.
LennyBloke
Posted 18/08/2023 - 10:26 Link
Ratcatcher wrote:
I'm Looking at getting a new lens in the 16/17- 50/70 F 2.8 range.
Your thoughts would be most welcome.
I see from your signature that you have (had?) a Pentax 18-135. What is it you are looking for in a new lens that would be different from that lens?
LennyBloke
Ratcatcher
Posted 18/08/2023 - 11:07 Link
LennyBloke wrote:
Ratcatcher wrote:
I'm Looking at getting a new lens in the 16/17- 50/70 F 2.8 range.
Your thoughts would be most welcome.
I see from your signature that you have (had?) a Pentax 18-135. What is it you are looking for in a new lens that would be different from that lens?
For the F 2.8
I’ve a early Tamron 17-50 which I’m looking at replacing.
LennyBloke
Posted 18/08/2023 - 13:16 Link
Ratcatcher wrote:
......For the F 2.8
I’ve a early Tamron 17-50 which I’m looking at replacing.
Okay, that makes sense

Might be worth considering one of the older Pentax 16-50 F2.8 SDM lenses - particularly if you don't mind a screw-drive converted model (the SDM motors were prone to failure after some time), I still have mine that I use on a K5IIs and have always been very happy with the IQ and the weather sealing. These lenses used to be quite expensive but used good condition copies have come down in price over the last few years.
LennyBloke
Spad
Posted 18/08/2023 - 13:58 Link
Sigma do one....

Here's one on FLEABAY

According to the REVIEWS it's a good lens.
Ratcatcher
Posted 18/08/2023 - 13:59 Link
Would also like it to be WR.
HarisF1
Posted 18/08/2023 - 14:38 Link
PM'd

All the gear with no idea
Jonathan-Mac
Posted 19/08/2023 - 10:38 Link
The best option is the HD DA 16-50mm f/2.8 - it's very expensive but your only option if you need WR. Avoid the old SDM one as the motors are very dodgy and the optics sub-par. That leaves the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 which is a wonderful lens though not WR. The Tamron rquivalent is also good but with worse build quality, screw-drive AF and QC problems, so check focusing and de-centring if buying. If a slower lens is an option then the DA 16-85mm is excellent - great range, very sharp, good colour and contrast.
Pentax hybrid user - Digital K3, film 645 and 35mm SLR and Pentax (&other) lenses adapted to Fuji X and Panasonic L digital
Fan of DA limited and old manual lenses
LennyBloke
Posted 19/08/2023 - 11:26 Link
Jonathan-Mac wrote:
The best option is the HD DA 16-50mm f/2.8 - it's very expensive but your only option if you need WR. Avoid the old SDM one as the motors are very dodgy and the optics sub-par. That leaves the Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 which is a wonderful lens though not WR. The Tamron rquivalent is also good but with worse build quality, screw-drive AF and QC problems, so check focusing and de-centring if buying. If a slower lens is an option then the DA 16-85mm is excellent - great range, very sharp, good colour and contrast.
Can't agree on the optics of the SDM 16-50/2.8 being "sub-par"! They may not be up to the standard of the newer version but the results I have had have been excellent, many shot at maximum aperture too
LennyBloke
Flan
Posted 19/08/2023 - 17:11 Link
Can't agree on the optics of the SDM 16-50/2.8 being "sub-par"! They may not be up to the standard of the newer version but the results I have had have been excellent, many shot at maximum aperture too [/quote]
Couldn't agree more. the older and much maligned by some (maybe a bad copy unluckily) DA* 16 50 is a super lens and renders beautiful Pentax colours and richness in many types of disciplines
All this talk of edge sharpness and such is insignificant when the image captured is of a high standard, it will positively glow
very good prices for used examples and even cheaper if you buy one with SDM failed and convert to screw drive yourself

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo