Negative scanner - any ideas?
Posted 05/09/2010 - 21:46
Link
I've got an Epson Perfection V500 PHOTO flatbed USB connected scanner which does everything I want of it - documents, photographs and negatives (comes with supplied frames to position the negs whilst scanning). Don't kid yourself that it's a swift process - far from it - but the results are good.
If you want to "try it out," you could post me a negative, I'll scan it and e-mail you the resultant digital pic.
Ray
If you want to "try it out," you could post me a negative, I'll scan it and e-mail you the resultant digital pic.
Ray
Z1, K10D, D-BG2 Grip, DA 1:3.5-5.6 18-55mm AL, DA 1:3.5-6.3 18-250mm ED AL(IF), AF540FGZ Flash, FA 1:1.7 50mm, DA 1:2.4 70mm Limited, Wireless Remote (Did I offend you? Click here).
Posted 05/09/2010 - 22:36
Link
Argee wrote:
I've got an Epson Perfection V500 PHOTO flatbed USB connected scanner which does everything I want of it - documents, photographs and negatives (comes with supplied frames to position the negs whilst scanning). Don't kid yourself that it's a swift process - far from it - but the results are good.
If you want to "try it out," you could post me a negative, I'll scan it and e-mail you the resultant digital pic.
Ray
To say 'me too' I have a Epson Perfection 4490 that deals with MF negs with ease.I've got an Epson Perfection V500 PHOTO flatbed USB connected scanner which does everything I want of it - documents, photographs and negatives (comes with supplied frames to position the negs whilst scanning). Don't kid yourself that it's a swift process - far from it - but the results are good.
If you want to "try it out," you could post me a negative, I'll scan it and e-mail you the resultant digital pic.
Ray
C
Posted 06/09/2010 - 11:41
Link
I've got an Epson Perfection V600 flatbed which does a very good job. Having said that around 80%+ of my scanning is from 120 size negatives, if I was just scanning 35mm negatives I'd have probably gone for a dedicated film scanner (dedicated MF film scanners cost way too much for me to afford).
Joining the Q
Posted 06/09/2010 - 13:37
Link
I have a Konica Minolta Dimage Dual Scan IV too, worth looking out for on eBay.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 06/09/2010 - 14:45
Link
I have version III of the Dual Scan which is excellent for 35mm. I am looking into a flatbed though for my medium format and 5x4 images.
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 06/09/2010 - 23:54
Link
Thanks for the thoughts. All very helpful. I can't see anywhere to buy the Minolta film scanner from. Does anyone know if its available under a different name or model number?
K10D,KX, DA 18-55, DA 17-70 AL(IF) SDM, DA*50-135, Sigma 70-300, DAL 50-300mm, Kenko 1.5x, loads of SD cards and even more optimism
Posted 07/09/2010 - 01:05
Link
The Minolta has been out of production for some years so eBay's your best bet.
Joining the Q
Posted 07/09/2010 - 07:39
Link
Digital Photo October Out Now. Review of new "Plustek opticfilm 76001 SE" Rated 5 star. I have, like many others, an Epson flatbed scanner which does the job for me but if you want a dedicated model then look this one up. CHEERS Vic.
Born again biker with lots of Pentax bits. Every day I wake up is a good day. I'm so old I don't even buy green bananas.
Posted 07/09/2010 - 08:57
Link
Be careful with old scanners a lot of them need a SCSI card.
I've got old Nikon and Olympus scanners but rarely use them
nowdays or any other SCSI stuff for that matter. I used to like
SCSI but the industry dropped it for Firewire and USB. Still got
SCSI DAT drives, Jaz drives, Tape drives etc.
I've got old Nikon and Olympus scanners but rarely use them
nowdays or any other SCSI stuff for that matter. I used to like
SCSI but the industry dropped it for Firewire and USB. Still got
SCSI DAT drives, Jaz drives, Tape drives etc.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 08/09/2010 - 22:02
Link
With the various scanners mentioned how much of a problem is film curl? I have just got back a newly developed film which has been cut into strips of 4 35 mm negatives.
Using my cheap veho scanner's strip holder the end negative is not properly held leading to that part being out of focus.
I imagine the best solution would be for the negatives to be sandwiched between glass plates?
Thanks again for all your comments
Using my cheap veho scanner's strip holder the end negative is not properly held leading to that part being out of focus.
I imagine the best solution would be for the negatives to be sandwiched between glass plates?
Thanks again for all your comments
K10D,KX, DA 18-55, DA 17-70 AL(IF) SDM, DA*50-135, Sigma 70-300, DAL 50-300mm, Kenko 1.5x, loads of SD cards and even more optimism
Posted 09/09/2010 - 08:23
Link
The Minolta film holders, one for strips of up to six frames and another for up to four mounted slides, hold the film perfectly flat. The scanner actually focusses and I'm not sure if the cheaper ones do. Glass plates would introduce another four surfaces to attract dust.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 09/09/2010 - 21:14
Link
Thanks Ken. I'm a little reluctant to buy second hand unless I knew the scanner had not had excessive use but its good to know that the Minolta does secure the negatives so well.
A general question to anyone who scans negatives - if you wanted to go to A4 size and had a good inkjet printer would the results via the scanner be as good as those returned by mail order D and PO houses? I wonder if these commercial mass D and P businesses use scan and inkjet rather than conventional enlarger. If they do use digital scans to rpint from then maybe a film scanner would be very comparable?
Geoff
A general question to anyone who scans negatives - if you wanted to go to A4 size and had a good inkjet printer would the results via the scanner be as good as those returned by mail order D and PO houses? I wonder if these commercial mass D and P businesses use scan and inkjet rather than conventional enlarger. If they do use digital scans to rpint from then maybe a film scanner would be very comparable?
Geoff
K10D,KX, DA 18-55, DA 17-70 AL(IF) SDM, DA*50-135, Sigma 70-300, DAL 50-300mm, Kenko 1.5x, loads of SD cards and even more optimism
Posted 09/09/2010 - 21:34
Link
Rataegeoff wrote:
if you wanted to go to A4 size and had a good inkjet printer would the results via the scanner be as good as those returned by mail order D and PO houses?
They can be, a lot depends on the negative/slide, the type of film used (some scan better than others) as well as the printer/paper combination.if you wanted to go to A4 size and had a good inkjet printer would the results via the scanner be as good as those returned by mail order D and PO houses?
TBH, if you just want prints of select negs you are probably better off sending them off. Scanning is a slow and painful business and by the time you have got a scanner, some negative cleaning fluid and pads, printer, paper, extra computer memory and so on it has turned into a major investment.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


163 posts
17 years
Leicester
I'm thinking that scanners (film and flatbed) will have improved at the same rate as digital cameras. Does anyone have any thoughts on or experience with a suitable scanner which might save me having to set up a wet dark room to make more creative use of 35mm black and white negatives?
I have a veho slide scanner which gives images which are ok for e-mailing but maybe not for decent sized prints.
One computer magazing mentions a C*non flatbed (9000F) as being a top choice but doesnt review it as a photo tool.