ND Grad kits - what to go for

morpheus71
Posted 18/05/2011 - 13:17 Link
Hi,

In a side track from the time consuming nature of my current methods of exposure fusions and HDR – I am planning to invest in a set of ND Grads (ideally a soft and hard set of each). I have been reading a bit about Kood, Cokin, SRB Griturn (also made by Formatt like the Hitech) and Hitech. Lee Filters are just a pipe dream in terms of cost at the moment.

I have heard that Cokin’s have a strong magenta cast if stacked.


I have read some reviews of all these in Advanced Photographer’s latest issue and still can’t make my mind up about the pros and cons of each system.

I guess the Kood’s appeal in theory if they are any good – but I don’t want to chuck my money away if I might regret that decision.

As an early 40th birthday present I have been very lucky that my family have given a workshop day with the awesomely talented Joe Cornish in July – so I think it would be expected that I went along with some ND Grads anyway! I assume he would think HDR is a swear word

Cheers,

Morpheus71
hefty1
Posted 18/05/2011 - 16:49 - Helpful Comment Link
With most things I'd say buy the best you can afford, however, with ND grads I'll take a slightly different route.

My anecdotal evidence points to the fact that most folk who buy a set of grads end up using them once or twice before relegating them to the back of the cupboard as they're unwieldy and tricky to use effectively without a bit of practice.

For that reason I'd say start off with a cheap set, see how you get on with them (magenta casts can be removed in PP anyway so they're not the end of the world) and if you like them save up for a set of Lees. If not (which statistically is more likely) then you won't have lost too much money and you can always sell them on to somebody else to have a play with.
Joining the Q
Anvh
Posted 18/05/2011 - 19:07 - Helpful Comment Link
morpheus71 wrote:


I have heard that Cokin’s have a strong magenta cast if stacked.
Not the Z-pro or X-pro, or at least not that much.
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
morpheus71
Posted 23/05/2011 - 15:58 Link
I am hoping to get a 10-20mm wide angle lens later this year for my K-X, the sensor is APS-C size, I have heard about vignetting problems at wide angle with some filter widths - would it be better to go for something wide now in terms of filters such as the Cokin Z-Pro system?
Sean282
Posted 23/05/2011 - 17:00 Link
I have hoya prodital filters (ND & CPL). I get vignetting between 10-12mm with both filters attached on the sigma. 12mm is still wide though so it doesn't bother me
Anvh
Posted 23/05/2011 - 18:00 Link
so out of my head the Z-pro holder is officially rated for 12mm on APS-C and that's with a single filter holder, The z-pro use 100mm filters just like most others so i doubt they will go any wider with their holders...
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Smeggypants
Posted 23/05/2011 - 19:20 Link
If cameras went down to ISO1 we wouldn't need them
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
MarkTaylor
Posted 23/05/2011 - 20:03 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
If cameras went down to ISO1 we wouldn't need them
Why stop at ISO 1, how about ISO 0.0000001?
My FlickrPentax K-5 • K-5 II • Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 DC HSM • Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD ASL • SMC Pentax-DA* 50-135mm F/2.8 ED [IF] SDM • SMC Pentax-DA 55-300mm F/4-5.8 ED • SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 ED AL [IF] WR • Vivitar 100mm F/3.5 Macro AF • Metz Mecablitz 58 AF-2
Smeggypants
Posted 23/05/2011 - 21:32 Link
MarkTaylor wrote:
Smeggypants wrote:
If cameras went down to ISO1 we wouldn't need them
Why stop at ISO 1, how about ISO 0.0000001?
Well yeah if you want to do an hour long exposure of the centre of the sun.

On a serious note I dunno why cams can't provide ISOs a lot lower then 80. At least they could go down to 25 or 12. A matter of reducing the gain post sensor, pre converters
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Anvh
Posted 23/05/2011 - 21:50 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
If cameras went down to ISO1 we wouldn't need them
We do because these are GND we are talking about not ND
Now if we had a very wide Dynamic range...
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Edited by Anvh: 23/05/2011 - 21:51
MarkTaylor
Posted 24/05/2011 - 08:16 Link
Smeggypants wrote:
MarkTaylor wrote:
Smeggypants wrote:
If cameras went down to ISO1 we wouldn't need them
Why stop at ISO 1, how about ISO 0.0000001?
Well yeah if you want to do an hour long exposure of the centre of the sun.
Now there's an idea!
My FlickrPentax K-5 • K-5 II • Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 DC HSM • Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD ASL • SMC Pentax-DA* 50-135mm F/2.8 ED [IF] SDM • SMC Pentax-DA 55-300mm F/4-5.8 ED • SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 ED AL [IF] WR • Vivitar 100mm F/3.5 Macro AF • Metz Mecablitz 58 AF-2
Edited by MarkTaylor: 24/05/2011 - 08:16
simonkit
Posted 24/05/2011 - 09:52 Link
I started with the Cokin P filters but did find quite a bit of colour cast, I now use the Hitech filters which to be honest still have some slight cast but much less than the Cokin.

I've found as Hefty mentions that, rather suprisingly, I don't use them very often - despite the frequent comments in Photo Mags that they're essential for landscape photography I find that if you catch the best lighting there's usually no need, probably even less so with the K5 and it's additional Dynamic range/low noise which should allow more detail to be lifted from shadows without problem noise - can't wait to try it in practice when I get chance!!
Edited by simonkit: 24/05/2011 - 09:52
jules
Posted 24/05/2011 - 10:03 - Helpful Comment Link
http://teamworkphoto.com/shop/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=1047_78_258
Not sure How wide they go but I had some sucsess with them and as Simon Says, they give much less colour cast than Cokin. I had the wide 85mm holder kit and it did seem very well made and I didn't notice vignetting on my Nikon 12-24mm with it but then you can set some Automatic corner illumination/vignetting correction with the Nikons and Canons. (Was Not even mentioned in the Nikon Manual for my D90 but it was in the D700!)How it fares on the Pentax/Samsung variety I don't know...
Cheers Jules...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.

www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
anwa
Posted 24/05/2011 - 15:59 Link
I started with a set of Cokin P ND grads and, like many others, found they gave a very strong magenta cast when stacked. It's a pain to remove the cast in post because it's graduated across the image. It isn't like removing a cast that's equal in intensity across a whole image - you have to fade the removal with the effect of the filter. If you have a lot of images from a shoot, that all adds up.
I replaced the Cokin filters with Hi-Tech/Formatt and they are a lot better, though still have a slight colour cast. One of them has a dent in the filter surface (though I've never seen it show up in an image) and one has more of a hard edge rather than graduation where the filtration starts, so I'm not convinced their quality control is terribly good but they do the job for me.
Unlike others, I use the grads a lot: pretty much every dawn and dusk landscape shot I take is with a grad.
In terms of what to go for, I use the ND4 and ND8 grads. I have an ND2 grad as it came in the filter kit, but never use it.
LennyBloke
Posted 25/05/2011 - 12:07 - Helpful Comment Link
I can add a rec for the Hi-Tech/Formatt ND grads as well - when I researched I was advised that they were better (in terms of colour cast) than cokins but if stacking the magenta cast may show up.

I took a set of photos a few months ago at Whitley Court, one or two of which I stacked, but I could not be certain from the resulting images which were stacked and which were single filters. This image is (I believe) a stacked shot....

Comment Image

LennyBloke

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo