MZ-7 or MZ-30
Posted 24/04/2005 - 22:50
Link
Look here for the differences:
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/MZ-ZX/index.html
For many people, the fact that the 30 can't use old M & K lenses would rule it out. If you only ever use a modern AF zoom, that won't worry you.
George
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/MZ-ZX/index.html
For many people, the fact that the 30 can't use old M & K lenses would rule it out. If you only ever use a modern AF zoom, that won't worry you.
George
Posted 24/04/2005 - 22:50
Link
Hi,
Both the MZ30 and MZ 50 were designed as entry level SLRs and tend to like working fully automated. Both have what people refer to as a "crippled mount". This means that you can only use leses with an A setting on them. The MZ7 is of a higher spec and will take all the leses including the K and M ones. The MZ7 also has one extra mode. Full details can be found here http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/MZ-ZX/index.html
Given the choice, I would go for the MZ7. It will prove more flexible in the future.
Kim
Both the MZ30 and MZ 50 were designed as entry level SLRs and tend to like working fully automated. Both have what people refer to as a "crippled mount". This means that you can only use leses with an A setting on them. The MZ7 is of a higher spec and will take all the leses including the K and M ones. The MZ7 also has one extra mode. Full details can be found here http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/bodies/MZ-ZX/index.html
Given the choice, I would go for the MZ7. It will prove more flexible in the future.
Kim
Posted 24/04/2005 - 22:50
Link
Snap.
G
G
Posted 24/04/2005 - 22:53
Link
We must have been typing at the same time
Kim
Kim
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2277 posts
24 years
I am looking to replace a broken MZ-50, which of these two would be the best value for money? And what are the main differences?
Cheers