Mount strength

Dangermouse
Posted 24/04/2011 - 23:28 Link
I knew there was a reason why I was only really happy using the K 85-210mm on the KX or MX. Something to do with the fact that it weighs the best part of a kilo and has no tripod ring, so you really want something which is metal from the tripod thread to the lens mount to attach it to!
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
womble
Posted 25/04/2011 - 10:44 Link
I sometimes wonder about the K300/4 on my K20D. The lack of tripod mount on that lens is a little worrying!

K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Algernon
Posted 25/04/2011 - 11:09 Link
With any equipment you have to devise a safe way of
handling/holding and transporting. Big lenses on a body are
safer carried vertically preferably above the camera body
with both hands. In use they should be handled with both
hands, tripod mount or not. Massive lenses are probably better
handled by the lens only as much as possible.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Anvh
Posted 25/04/2011 - 13:39 Link
The mount on the Pentax is directly mounted on the metal chassis inside on all there K DSLR camera's so they should be pretty strong.
Some other manufactures don't use a metal chassis on their budget camera's or even mid ranges one so their mount is mounted on plastic... One more reason to buy a Kx or Kr instead of another brand
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo