More Waxwings - DA 300

Blythman
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:06 Link
Photographed some Waxwings on Saturday with the Siggy 150-500. Well I got another chance to capture them on Sunday. This time used the DA* 300mm.

The shots I took on Saturday with the Siggy were mostly taken at fovcal lengths not too far either side of 300mm, so it made an interesting comparison.

My thoughts on the day was that I lost focus more often with the DA than I had with the Siggy, so I missed quite a few shots. The ones I did get however were sharper. Several factors played a part in this though, so not straightfoward.

Slightly better light, larger aperture allowing increased shutter speeds and finally using a lovely 300mm prime.

Anyway, here's some pics. Hope you like.

Comment Image

Waxwing with a gob full by Alan Wennington, on Flickr

Comment Image

Waxwing upside down by Alan Wennington, on Flickr

Comment Image

Another Waxwing eating berries by Alan Wennington, on Flickr

Comment Image

Waxwing - not many more .. lol by Alan Wennington, on Flickr

Comment Image

Waxwing. Last one for now by Alan Wennington, on Flickr

And finally a female blackbird

Comment Image

Blackbird by Alan Wennington, on Flickr
Alan


PPG
Flickr
davem
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:30 Link
Alan,

I am really enjoying this series of photographs. The poses are very much like Victorian watercolour illustrations.

Are you cropping these a lot from the original or you able to get really close?

Dave
Jumbo48
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:36 Link
Another superb collection, and as davem said really enjoying these photographs.
Regards John/Jumbo
Blythman
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:37 Link
Thanks for feedback Dave/John . Crops, but not massive crops by any means. Maybe using about a third of the overall frame. They really allow you to get very close
Alan


PPG
Flickr
Edited by Blythman: 05/11/2012 - 20:38
davem
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:40 Link
In that case the detail is really very good. Did you use the 300 handheld?

Dave
Blythman
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:45 Link
davem wrote:
In that case the detail is really very good. Did you use the 300 handheld?

Dave
Yeah Dave, handheld. Tried monopod once, for low light owls. Very restricting.
Alan


PPG
Flickr
weinelm
Posted 05/11/2012 - 20:54 Link
Wow, love these. Absolutely fantastic!
Panasonic GX80, Pentax MX, Mamiya 6. My Flickr
ReklawyksEkul
Posted 05/11/2012 - 21:01 Link
great vibrant sharp images. I like the second and third image
iqbal

learning in progress...

picasa
flickr
photoblog
PPG
davidstorm
Posted 05/11/2012 - 21:20 Link
The shots with the Sigma were good Alan, but these are streets ahead in terms of clarity, colour and sharpness. They are testament to your ability to hold a lens steady and also a fabulous advert for the DA*300.

This lens will soon be on my shopping list!

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
darkskies
Posted 05/11/2012 - 21:23 Link
davidstorm wrote:
The shots with the Sigma were good Alan, but these are streets ahead in terms of clarity, colour and sharpness. They are testament to your ability to hold a lens steady and also a fabulous advert for the DA*300.

This lens will soon be on my shopping list!

Regards
David
Couldn't agree more.
This space deliberately left blank.
matwhittington
Posted 05/11/2012 - 21:24 Link
Great set - love them all! Well done

Cheers
Mat W

My Flickr: link
geordie01
Posted 05/11/2012 - 21:26 Link
As David has said i much prefer these to the earlier one's with the sigma
for me there is no contest the DA* wins hands down.Now where is that tree?!!
Frogfish
Posted 06/11/2012 - 02:04 Link
Another very nice set Alan - I do love these birds !

People are going a little OTT on the DA*300 I feel. I have and love this lens but unless conditions are near identical it is difficult to judge.

In this case better light (blue not grey skies !), a larger aperture and faster shutter speeds are going to make a big difference to sharpness, colour and clarity, especially so when hand-holding big lenses such as the 150-500. Though the DA*300 is of course still a better lens overall !

The point made about the focusing speed of the DA*300 vs the Sigma 150-500 just seems to bear out the test that that European magazine made, Pentax cameras & lenses target accuracy over speed. I've found this to be true of the Nikon/Sigma 500mm too, much faster but not always as accurate.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Smeggypants
Posted 06/11/2012 - 07:26 Link
My constructive: A bit too blue on the colour balance and a bit too bright..... but ....

....other than that they are fantastic captures!!!

Perfectly captured birdie going about his/her business harvesting the berries!!

I'm not normally into bird or flower shots, but these are the wildlife equivalent of human street candid shots and are excellent!!

The last shot of the female blackbird is boring in comparison and I really feel you should have left it out of the set. All the rest are stunning and I have no favourite as they all capture real bird life in it's honesty.

Well done, really enjoyed looking at them.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Smeggypants
Posted 06/11/2012 - 07:39 Link
Blythman wrote:


Slightly better light, larger aperture allowing increased shutter speeds and finally using a lovely 300mm prime.

Don't underestimate the value of this!!! The main reason your set here has so much impact is the depth caused by the narrower DOF due to the wider aperture. This is more important than sharpness IMO.

Increased shutter speed ( while desirable ) is a secondary bonus compared to the shallower DOF obtained from wider apertures.

IMO too many photographers get so hung up on getting everything sharp they end up with flat deathless images because they stop down too much.

The bits that are out of focus and giving the bokeh are very important to providing a vibrant image IMO and you've succeeded 100% in this set.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo