More milk!

i-Berg
Posted 01/10/2010 - 09:26 Link
Nowhere near as close up as Dave's - these weren't so cooperative...

Rear views
[IMG]http://i772.photobucket.com/albums/yy9/i_berg/Broken%20Drought/_IGP7030-2R.jpg[/IMG]

Front view
[IMG]http://i772.photobucket.com/albums/yy9/i_berg/Broken%20Drought/_IGP7026-1R.jpg[/IMG]

C&C welcome as always.
i-Berg
Posted 01/10/2010 - 10:31 Link
Both with 50-135 Gareth. The 202 mm is the 35mm equivalent.
Edited by i-Berg: 01/10/2010 - 10:31
thoughton
Posted 01/10/2010 - 10:47 Link
Nice shots iberg, especially number 2. I like that desat look as well. Can see what gareth means about the busy bokeh in 1 - PP induced? apologies for no caps stillngetting used to my new ipad
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
i-Berg
Posted 01/10/2010 - 11:07 Link
That's actually quite interesting - thanks Gareth and Tim for pointing it out.

I've reset the image in question, and even the original raw file looks to have quite 'nervous' bokeh in that region of the crop.

I've then gone to the next image in the series, and lo! Same stuff! Lacking in inspiration for now, the best suggestion I can offer is that it may be a combination of focal length, aperture / dof, and the particular background pattern created by the leaves on the willow trees behind. The camera clearly doesn't like it. It's the same lens / camera combo I've used in many other scenarios (some of which were posted here as jpg crops too) - none of those was affected.

Hmm - maybe a K5 might solve this...

Edit - Tim: Congrats on the new i-Pad - happy:
Edited by i-Berg: 01/10/2010 - 11:08
TonyM
Posted 01/10/2010 - 15:33 Link
This bokeh behaviour is something I've noticed on the 50-135mm. Still my best lens, though Nice shots.
davidtrout
Posted 01/10/2010 - 15:45 Link
Never mind the bokeh, there's nothing wrong with the sharpness of the lens. The detail is quality stuff. I too like the way you've desaturated the pictures.
David
K10D
Posted 01/10/2010 - 15:45 Link
Aye, I like these. Wonderful detail and clarity with depth control (f/5.6).

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Mike-P
Posted 01/10/2010 - 17:03 Link
Interesting processing, quite different actually.

like the second one especially.
bwlchmawr
Posted 01/10/2010 - 17:05 Link
The clever and subtle post processing raise these above the level of simple sheep shots. (Try saying that quickly!)
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
fitypoundpdog
Posted 02/10/2010 - 08:34 Link
The processing adds a pleasant drama to the humdrum life of the sheep.
very nice,
Kevin
i-Berg
Posted 02/10/2010 - 08:48 Link
Thanks everyone for the comments - the processing is courtesy of LR3.2. I'm very happy with what it does with images.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo