Monthly Comp #11 – A Modern Building - Discussion
Posted 12/05/2013 - 10:03
Link
So, two of the six were taken well outside the time frame. And one of them does not even use a Pentax.
A third might have been outside the time frame, but it could have been a setup error on the camera given the time it was taken, 00:07, but in natural light.
I am surprised that people actually get the subject right when they do not read the rules.
A third might have been outside the time frame, but it could have been a setup error on the camera given the time it was taken, 00:07, but in natural light.
I am surprised that people actually get the subject right when they do not read the rules.
Posted 12/05/2013 - 10:08
Link
Every few days we have a look and remove any invalid entries. I've just done that now, so the competition is down to three entries.
Please read the rules everyone who enters.
Please read the rules everyone who enters.
Best regards, John
Posted 16/05/2013 - 23:30
Link
Invalid entry removed, please ensure all monthly comp entries are taken in the month of the competition.
Best regards, John
Posted 17/05/2013 - 06:30
Link
Another one gone this morning
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 17/05/2013 - 09:30
Link
I noticed that one entrant had his first removed and then put a second in which was also removed.
Posted 17/05/2013 - 13:36
Link
I don't know what we can do to make the rules clearer, any suggestions anyone?
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 17/05/2013 - 14:37
Link
change the title to. "images taken THIS current month.". or "comp for image taken in JUNE 2013", or the "monthly RTFR, YLBOB comp".
The F and one B are rude words!
The F and one B are rude words!
Lurking is shirking.!
Posted 17/05/2013 - 14:43
Link
Just ban persistent offenders for being stupid.
Posted 17/05/2013 - 16:56
Link
as dougf8 says: RTFR
And maybe also insist that they provide te image with ALL EXIF intact ... I notice that on some most is there but the date is missing!
And maybe also insist that they provide te image with ALL EXIF intact ... I notice that on some most is there but the date is missing!
Posted 25/05/2013 - 11:33
Link
Gamka wrote:
as dougf8 says: RTFR
And maybe also insist that they provide te image with ALL EXIF intact ... I notice that on some most is there but the date is missing!
Don't some processing programs strip the exif. If the date taken is stated in the comments I usually give the benefit of the doubt, I believe most people are basically honest
as dougf8 says: RTFR
And maybe also insist that they provide te image with ALL EXIF intact ... I notice that on some most is there but the date is missing!
Posted 25/05/2013 - 11:45
Link
Using Save For Web also removes the EXIF data. Save As keeps it intact. Sometimes I find an older image that I want to use and it was saved with the former, so then it needs care to ensure it was a Pentax image and that the correct info is inserted.
Sometimes if images have been mixed or a copy made, for example a digital copy of a print or a scan, then spurious EXIF data remains. Some of my black and white prints were copied on an early Fuji S7000 digital camera, which is misleading as they were actually shot on Pentax film cameras.
Sometimes if images have been mixed or a copy made, for example a digital copy of a print or a scan, then spurious EXIF data remains. Some of my black and white prints were copied on an early Fuji S7000 digital camera, which is misleading as they were actually shot on Pentax film cameras.
Best regards, John
Posted 30/05/2013 - 22:37
Link
I now have an early start on the 1st June, so the results may not be posted until the 2nd. Especially if we have a rush of late entries.
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6913 posts
17 years
Co. Durham UK
Happy shooting.
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/