Mid range zoom lense advise please
The first, the big, black, power-zoom (PZ) is perhaps the best optically.
The next, which is also 1:4-5.6 is perhaps the least good.
The current model (or last one) is slightly faster wide-open (1:3.2-5.6), and considered to be almost as good as the PZ. It's also a lot smaller and lighter.
G
Be aware that there are three Pentax-FA 28-105 lenses.
The first, the big, black, power-zoom (PZ) is perhaps the best optically.
The next, which is also 1:4-5.6 is perhaps the least good.
The current model (or last one) is slightly faster wide-open (1:3.2-5.6), and considered to be almost as good as the PZ. It's also a lot smaller and lighter.
G
Now that I have the 24-90...
Just to confuse things there is also a Tamron 24-135 for about £330
Be aware that there are three Pentax-FA 28-105 lenses.
The first, the big, black, power-zoom (PZ) is perhaps the best optically.
The next, which is also 1:4-5.6 is perhaps the least good.
The current model (or last one) is slightly faster wide-open (1:3.2-5.6), and considered to be almost as good as the PZ. It's also a lot smaller and lighter.
G
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Be aware that there are three Pentax-FA 28-105 lenses.
The first, the big, black, power-zoom (PZ) is perhaps the best optically.
The next, which is also 1:4-5.6 is perhaps the least good.
The current model (or last one) is slightly faster wide-open (1:3.2-5.6), and considered to be almost as good as the PZ. It's also a lot smaller and lighter.
G
But it's no secret that there are two holy books for all Pentax collectors - the gospel according to Boz, and the gospel according to Stan, and I am sufficiently familiar with both that I can usually recall the salient facts about a piece of kit without looking it up.
The PDML (which is where Stan Halpin got his info) is also an excellent resource, as is the AOHC for screw-mount stuff.
Incidentally, although he doesn't brag about it, JR has owned more lenses than most people have had hot dinners.
G
EDIT:
http://stans-photography.info/
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/ (AKA Boz)
I have spent many hours browsing through Boz and Stans web sites and find them very informative Thanks again
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


134 posts
19 years
North Wales
K100D with kit 18-55
Tamron 70-300
Pentax 50mm 1.7
2x macro/teleconverter
1.4x teleconverter
I would like a better "everyday lense" but don't want a full range 18-250 type lense as I have the tamron already. Ideally I'd like to get a sigma 10-20mm eventually but not a priority now.
Question is - does anyone have any experiences or opinions on the following two lense options: -
Get Pentax 28-105 (£240) and keep the 18-55 kit lense for now.
Get Sigma 18-125 (£185) and get rid/part ex the 18-55 - I am leaning towards this option at the moment.
Just to confuse things there is also a Tamron 24-135 for about £330 - this would really be pushing the finances though and I can't really see the advantage over the sigma re focal lengths - not sure about quality thou.
Cheers
Donut