Manfrotto tripod - which one?
Posted 28/03/2009 - 18:01
Link
Coriander wrote:
If you thought that deciding on a tripod was the most difficult part of photography, and because of this just plumped for a brand name that sounded good, like... Manfrotto... Which one would you choose?
Requirements are for a sturdy, heavy duty model with tilt and pan head, you know, not the ball joint type.
Budget irrelevant for this exercise.
Any favourites?
I would if I were in your position, Manfrotto are well over priced as can be seen by the discounts advertised.
I have used Slik tripods for thirty seven years, they are well made like Pentax, there must be a tripod in their range to suite you and I am confident you will not pay through the nose, furthermore, once you have used it, you'll wonder why you first wanted a Manfrotto I think sometimes its an image thing and we are all victims of advertising
.
If you thought that deciding on a tripod was the most difficult part of photography, and because of this just plumped for a brand name that sounded good, like... Manfrotto... Which one would you choose?
Requirements are for a sturdy, heavy duty model with tilt and pan head, you know, not the ball joint type.
Budget irrelevant for this exercise.
Any favourites?
I would if I were in your position, Manfrotto are well over priced as can be seen by the discounts advertised.
I have used Slik tripods for thirty seven years, they are well made like Pentax, there must be a tripod in their range to suite you and I am confident you will not pay through the nose, furthermore, once you have used it, you'll wonder why you first wanted a Manfrotto I think sometimes its an image thing and we are all victims of advertising
.
Posted 28/03/2009 - 18:16
Link
Ok you need to decide material - carbon fibre is lightweight and sturdy, but expensive.
Then you need to decide how tall you want the tripod to be, without using the centre column. And how low you want it to go. Whether you intend to carry it about with you or is it for home use only. How heavy is your equipment - the heaviest lens you have plus the weight of your camera plus the weight of a head which will take that weight = the minimum weight the tripod must hold. Go for the least number of leg sections you can - more less = sections less stability.
Then look at the Manfrotto site, the Velbon site, the Gitzo site, the Slik site plus any others you can find and see which tripods/heads meet your requirements. You don't have to have a head which is the same make as the tripod.
If you can go to a shop and see some tripods, taking your camera and lens with you to try out. See which one feels right.
I have a Velbon CF 630, which together with the head (a Markins Q ball) cost more than the camera I had at the time, but definitely worth it.
Then you need to decide how tall you want the tripod to be, without using the centre column. And how low you want it to go. Whether you intend to carry it about with you or is it for home use only. How heavy is your equipment - the heaviest lens you have plus the weight of your camera plus the weight of a head which will take that weight = the minimum weight the tripod must hold. Go for the least number of leg sections you can - more less = sections less stability.
Then look at the Manfrotto site, the Velbon site, the Gitzo site, the Slik site plus any others you can find and see which tripods/heads meet your requirements. You don't have to have a head which is the same make as the tripod.
If you can go to a shop and see some tripods, taking your camera and lens with you to try out. See which one feels right.
I have a Velbon CF 630, which together with the head (a Markins Q ball) cost more than the camera I had at the time, but definitely worth it.
Posted 28/03/2009 - 19:19
Link
Manfrotto 055 Classic with whatever head you prefer.
It does the job and it's sturdy. I use mine mainly for close up and macro work and I find it reliable and efficient.
It does the job and it's sturdy. I use mine mainly for close up and macro work and I find it reliable and efficient.
Best regards, John
Posted 28/03/2009 - 19:59
Link
Hi Coriander i use a giottos mt9251 tripod with a giottos mh-1000 ball head i have had them a couple of years now.I love em! because they are so industrial and rock solid and still look new after 2 years.Give em a look at http://www.giottos.com/
Posted 28/03/2009 - 21:06
Link
'Slik The Professional 4' would be my recommendation.
A daft name but a very tall, solid tripod.
A daft name but a very tall, solid tripod.
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 28/03/2009 - 21:17
Link
Giottos MTL 9351B a very versatile tripod, put on any head you prefer and you should be happy.
The older I get the faster I was.
Dave
K-3 II, K10D, DA16-85, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA18-55, DA 50, Sigma EX DG 70mm Macro, Sigma 70-300mm, Sigma DG 120-400mm APO HSM.
Metz 58 AF-1.
My Flickr link
Dave
K-3 II, K10D, DA16-85, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA18-55, DA 50, Sigma EX DG 70mm Macro, Sigma 70-300mm, Sigma DG 120-400mm APO HSM.
Metz 58 AF-1.
My Flickr link
Posted 28/03/2009 - 23:43
Link
I've got an older model Manfrotto 055 and it's been with me through several cameras - it still looks new and I'm pretty confident it'll outlive me!
Whichever tripod you buy get a good one; you're unlikely to chop and change it like you will other equipment and a good tripod will last a lifetime.
Whichever tripod you buy get a good one; you're unlikely to chop and change it like you will other equipment and a good tripod will last a lifetime.
Joining the Q
Posted 29/03/2009 - 11:11
Link
I'm taking on board all comments and will look at those suggested. As Hefty1 says, it's best to get it right first time round, chopping and changing would be a pain.
Unlocker, thanks for the offer, I'll bear it in mind.
As expected, a lot of different views on which is likely to be the best tripod and it comes down to personal preference but it is useful to see individuals' comments. I'll get to know what to look for and what to possibly avoid.
It all comes down to playing with them in the showroom to get an idea of the look and feel. Gywn, thanks for the tip about taking my gear along when I try out the tripods
Don't stop posting your comments, all gratefully received.
Unlocker, thanks for the offer, I'll bear it in mind.
As expected, a lot of different views on which is likely to be the best tripod and it comes down to personal preference but it is useful to see individuals' comments. I'll get to know what to look for and what to possibly avoid.
It all comes down to playing with them in the showroom to get an idea of the look and feel. Gywn, thanks for the tip about taking my gear along when I try out the tripods
Don't stop posting your comments, all gratefully received.
K10D with Grip, 28mm,50mm,135mm,18-55,18-200,70-300mm, Meade 2000mm catadioptric, dodgy tripod and luck
Posted 04/04/2009 - 09:25
Link
hi there,
I will also go for the Manfrotto 055, is sturdy enough and is served me well when it needed.
claudio
I will also go for the Manfrotto 055, is sturdy enough and is served me well when it needed.
claudio
DA*16-50
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


107 posts
17 years
Sunny Swindon
Requirements are for a sturdy, heavy duty model with tilt and pan head, you know, not the ball joint type.
Budget irrelevant for this exercise.
Any favourites?
.