Maldon

ems82
Posted 24/05/2011 - 15:59 Link
Here are some I took at weekend in Maldon. They are not great but I think I imptroving a bit any help greatly appriecated. Im not completly happy with first one doesnt seem to have any punch if you no what I mean. Also edited using a trial version of CS5, now I really want that software but I willkeep dreaming
1
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/m1-1.jpg[/IMG]
2
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/m2.jpg[/IMG]
3
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/m3.jpg[/IMG]
4
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/m4.jpg[/IMG]
5
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/m5.jpg[/IMG]
6
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/m6.jpg[/IMG]
7
[IMG]http://i590.photobucket.com/albums/ss344/ems82_photos/maldon.jpg[/IMG]
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
Edited by ems82: 24/05/2011 - 16:18
bwlchmawr
Posted 25/05/2011 - 07:30 Link
My favourite is no.4. Ems. It's nicely composed and pleasingly sharp. The shot of the lane disappearing into the distance is also good. Some of the others have a filmic, vintage feel due to the soft focus and low contast effects.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
thoughton
Posted 26/05/2011 - 23:41 Link
2 and 4 for me, solid composition and exposure (although possibly very slightly too dark). Some of the other shots seem to be drastically underexposed though, was that your intention? 1 and 5 in particular, shouldn't the highlights on those clouds should be white? 6 and 7 are better, but I think are both still quite gloomy although the compositions seem fine. 6 needs the horizon straightened though Hope that helps!
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 26/05/2011 - 23:43
Pentaxophile
Posted 26/05/2011 - 23:52 Link
No. 2 has good contrast, the rest I find a bit murky although perhaps you were going for 'low key'

I would have a look at the levels histogram, and pull your sliders closer to the beginning and end of the histogram. Another trick is to use the levels 'eye-dropper' - click the white dropper on your brightest highlight, and it and all equivalent tones will become white. In a similar way, use the black 'eye-dropper' on something which should be black.
ems82
Posted 27/05/2011 - 08:41 Link
Ok thanks for comments I wasnt too happy with them PP wise. I will have another go. Thanks again.
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
Smeggypants
Posted 28/05/2011 - 00:19 Link
#2 for me - it perfectly captures the track.

And I agree with bwlchmawr on the vintage feel. The last two could have been taken in the late 1800s. Which actually gives them some charm.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo