macro lens
Posted 17/06/2011 - 14:21
Link
What are you planning to use it for ? For insects etc. the longer the macro lense the better ... longer working distance. When you get to 35/50 macros you have very limited working distances.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Posted 17/06/2011 - 16:06
Link
Good comment about the 100mm being a bit long for a portrait lens. The Sigma 70mm might work, and would be a good compromise as well as having amazing IQ (as most macro lenses have). I've got the Tamron 90mm which is great, it works for candid portraits but I tend to prefer my DA35 or A50mm for more intimate close up portraits and full body shots. 35mm is often said to exaggerate people's features a bit too much but I don't mind the effect. And even with a 90mm lens i'm too clumsy to photograph nervous insects so the 35mm macro appeals as a lens which can take into flower buds and down among clumps of toadstools etc.
Posted 17/06/2011 - 17:08
Link
As Mike-P said the Sigma 70mm macro is an excellent lens. Recommended.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6 posts
15 years
Somerset
thanks
Richard