Macro: 360FGZ as main light & camera flash as fill?
A ring flash would be the perfect answer, plus a small XtraFlash to one side to improve the modelling if that is more to your liking. The results from this set up look pretty good to me.
I find this give a good light, not too harsh, with some modeling.
Something like this...

(Was looking for an appropriate fungus, but too tired...)
Oh, hang on, I'll roll out this one again:

Dan
Oh, nice images too. I'm hoping to get a bit of rim lighting underneath the fungi.
easy way to control the flash output from the camera
Thanks.
The only thing you can do is choose whether it contributes to the main flash or not in wireless mode.
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
Wouldn't it be nice if Pentax would retrofit some of the K10D firmware goodies into the *istD.
I doubt that they will, but we can live in hope . . .
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


63 posts
22 years
Melbourne,
Australia
I don't particularly like the look of a ringflash (and don't have one anyway) but realise the fill should be directly above the lens, so I'm figuring the onboard flash will do nicely. Trouble is, can I decrease power on this independantly (using *istD), or do I need to use some ND filters on the front? I plan to create a softbox of some sort for it so it will be diffused anyway.
I'll be using a DFA 100mm f2.8 with this. Planning on shooting toadstool/other fungi for a Uni assignment initially.
Any help appreciated.