Low light lens recommendation

ilikepirates
Posted 06/10/2011 - 23:59 Link
Hey guys! Not sure if any of you remember me - probably not. But I joined a few months ago

I just upgraded and got myself the k5 and I'm loving it but I want more! I'm trying to find a good low light lens as I have a bunch of low light stuff planned ahead so I want to be able to get good photos.

Preferably auto-focus as I'm still not great at manual focusing and I will have to be snapping quickly. Any help would be great.

I have a prince range of about £400.

Thanks guys!
Opethian
Posted 07/10/2011 - 00:10 Link
I think many will suggest the FA 50mm 1.4 as a very good starting point for a "fast" lens. If it's too narrow, then the Sigma 30 1.4 is also a good recommendation. Both should be well within £400.

Are you looking for zooms as well? If so, any of the 2.8's will do (18-50, 24-70, 28-75).
ilikepirates
Posted 07/10/2011 - 00:34 Link
Opethian wrote:
I think many will suggest the FA 50mm 1.4 as a very good starting point for a "fast" lens. If it's too narrow, then the Sigma 30 1.4 is also a good recommendation. Both should be well within £400.

Are you looking for zooms as well? If so, any of the 2.8's will do (18-50, 24-70, 28-75).
Oh thankyou very much! Will the 2.8 be good for concert photography?
Opethian
Posted 07/10/2011 - 01:17 Link
I think for concert photography, it's either an 85mm 1.4 if you can get close enough, or if not, the standard is a 70-200 2.8 (but these cost at around £500 upwards).
cabstar
Posted 07/10/2011 - 01:36 Link
Shoot the majority of my concert photography with the DA* 50-135mm & the Tamron 17-50mm, very rarely use my 50 1.4
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
MarkD
Posted 07/10/2011 - 07:24 Link
There are lots of old M series 50mm lenses f 1.7 and f1.4 that can be had for £30 to £50 if you want to experiment. Autofocus probably won't work very well in low light anyway. But as you have a K5 any f2.8 is probably fast enough. It really is incredibly good even at ISO3200.
You'd be better off getting a decent tripod first.
.........all the gear, no idea!
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
Edited by MarkD: 07/10/2011 - 07:24
gartmore
Posted 07/10/2011 - 07:28 Link
I've just shot a concert entirely on the DA35mm f2.4 but it was at the Dress Rehearsal so I had access to go anywhere. I was shooting at 800ISO and 1/90 at f3.5

TBH I would find a tripod a bit of a liability, you can't easily use it in amongst seats or in the pit, there just isn't enough room and you can't react quickly enough. I often used to use a monopod before SR.

I also use the Pentax-F 50mm f1.7 and occasionally the Opteka 85mm f1.4
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Edited by gartmore: 07/10/2011 - 07:32
MarkD
Posted 07/10/2011 - 09:28 Link
Agreed , my comments were for general low light photography.
Concerts are usually relatively well lit , at least the band members, and shouldn't be a problem for the K5.
.........all the gear, no idea!
Me super, MX, LX, K5,DA 18-55WR, DA 17-70, DA 55-300, DA40 Ltd, FA50 1.4, Samsung D-Xenon 12-24,Samsung 100mm macro M50 1.7(x3), M28 3.5, M35 2.8, M100macro f4, M135 3.5(+others)
simonkit
Posted 07/10/2011 - 11:34 Link
I've owned the FA50mm 1.4 in the past and it was an excellent lens, the one problem I had with it though is that I found the focal length a bit too long for general use, I now use the FA 35 F2 and find it pretty much perfect. There's obviously the new DA 35mm (which I've also owned), differences between the 2 are probably minimal but for reasons difficult to explain I prefer the FA

Simon
Cuchulainn
Posted 07/10/2011 - 11:41 Link
If you do pick up the FA50 1.4, one thing to realise is that it's slightly soft at 1.4, but pretty sharp by 2, so since you have a k5, it's worth sticking it on AV, setting the aperture to 2, and upping the ISO if necessary. Don't take this as a negative for the lens - I really like mine, but I find some of my other primes to be sharper wide open (though none of them are 1.4!). and by f5.6-f8 the fa50 is superbly sharp!
cabstar
Posted 07/10/2011 - 11:43 Link
I don't in general struggle with autofocus on my k-5 at the shows I have shot with it so far, I also have no issue shooting at iso 2000 either...

K-5 DA* 50-135mm 2.8

ISO 1600
1/250
f/2.8

Comment Image
PPG Wedding photography Flickr
Concert photography

Currently on a Pentax hiatus until an FF Pentax is released
Edited by cabstar: 07/10/2011 - 11:43

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo