Limited Conundrum...
70 is next then methinks...
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
70mm is really good too, but my only gripe is that it doesn't seem quite so stellar at infinity as it does at intermediate and closer distances. still great throughout the range, though.
but the 40mm is a serious piece of work—to pack that performance into that size is really something. enjoy it! but don't lose it, accidentally, because, you know, it's pretty small...
The amount of body caps,, lens caps, terminal caps, I have lost is unbelievable
Worst when I can see it happening and can't stop it! I've rolled em off cliffs and allsorts, My Partner has threatened to carry spares or do the Mother thing and put em on a long peice of string thru my jacket like with kids mittens
Yeah I can see me being in the Doghouse for losing the 40, sort of leaning toward a kr body and just leave it on there as my walk around/go anywhere ready cam.
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
As you are working your way through your conundrums, perhaps you could help me with mine.
I note that you have both the 15 Ltd and 21, do you find they are complimentary or does the 15 take the place of the 21. I currently have the 21 and use it a lot, but just wonder if the 15 would replace or compliment or only have a limited role to play.
Thanks for any insight you may be able to offer.
Jim
I'm considering the 35 macro as well. I want a decent prime in the 21 to 35 mm range, and the macro seems to be worth the money....
Morning Jules
I note that you have both the 15 Ltd and 21, do you find they are complimentary or does the 15 take the place of the 21. I currently have the 21 and use it a lot, but just wonder if the 15 would replace or compliment or only have a limited role to play.
Thanks for any insight you may be able to offer.
Jim

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Wider views work best for interior spaces, city streets and anywhere there is a strong frame to stabilise the image for the eye. That's where the DA12-24 rocks and presumably the DA15 as well. The DA21 is popular with street shooters and that makes total sense. I have a Vivitar 24mm f/2 I use for that purpose.
I owned the 12-24mm for a short time and mine spent all it's time at 24mm. I think I pulled this one off but it's a rarity for me...

My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Thanks for you perspective on this lens.
Will have to see that holds LBA it at bay.
Jim
I broadly agree here, there is a certain amount of technique to filling the foreground with the really wides that I've never quite got!
Look at the glossy photo magazines and they are full of such photos. It is the landscape equivalent of the extremely thin DOF shot... looks dramatic but it is not an expression of how we normally look at a scene. I like them well enough, but for regular day-to-day landscape shooting prefer something less showy and more representative.
I broadly agree here, there is a certain amount of technique to filling the foreground with the really wides that I've never quite got!
Look at the glossy photo magazines and they are full of such photos. It is the landscape equivalent of the extremely thin DOF shot... looks dramatic but it is not an expression of how we normally look at a scene. I like them well enough, but for regular day-to-day landscape shooting prefer something less showy and more representative.

in the above image I used the 10-17 fisheye to get a mountain shot in with some poppies at Lake Louise in Alberta.
I used the ppoppies to block the view of all the tourists on the pathways between me and the lake.
[quote:3496ace15f="jules"] Look at the glossy photo magazines and they are full of such photos. It is the landscape equivalent of the extremely thin DOF shot... looks dramatic but it is not an expression of how we normally look at a scene. I like them well enough, but for regular day-to-day landscape shooting prefer something less showy and more representative.
I find myself now always taking a couple with the 21 as well when I spot the really wide shot with the 15, because more often than not I'll like the 21 version better
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


175 posts
20 years
Hamilton,
Ontario
Mike