Lens Hood for 135mm
- Topic Locked - You will not be able to post to this topic. Duplicated thread
Posted 03/03/2009 - 14:45
Link
You don't really need a petal hood for a prime. I would have thought a cheap rubber screw on type would be fine.
Cheers, Kris.
PS don't forget the K 135mm f/2.5 and check if it is the non-SMC ones (emiliarts is selling a couple if those.)
Cheers, Kris.
PS don't forget the K 135mm f/2.5 and check if it is the non-SMC ones (emiliarts is selling a couple if those.)
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 03/03/2009 - 16:00
Link
Apart from *not* buying a hood (see my reply on the other thread) the M version is a 49mm thread...
Joining the Q
Posted 03/03/2009 - 23:09
Link
With the exception of the original SMCP series (K) 135mm lenses, all Pentax 135mm lenses have built in hoods. That includes M, A, F, & FA lenses.
You can check all of them here.
BTW, You seem to have posted this twice, which is a dumb thing to do. Now you have to check replies in two places instead of just the one. Please don't double post.
You can check all of them here.
BTW, You seem to have posted this twice, which is a dumb thing to do. Now you have to check replies in two places instead of just the one. Please don't double post.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
679 posts
17 years
Essex
Thanks
Rob