LBA kicks in (again)
Posted 18/06/2010 - 13:51
Link
I haven't bought a lens for a month now.
I'm taking it one day at a time.
But I have bought a flash, a light meter, some batteries, a strap...
I'm taking it one day at a time.
But I have bought a flash, a light meter, some batteries, a strap...
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Posted 18/06/2010 - 14:09
Link
I find it slows down after you have all the affordable lenses that Pentax made...
Doing pretty well for a collection of K and M series glass worth owning for sane money, I wouldn't mind a 100mm prime at some point and a 28-50mm but I have most of the rest.
Doing pretty well for a collection of K and M series glass worth owning for sane money, I wouldn't mind a 100mm prime at some point and a 28-50mm but I have most of the rest.
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 18/06/2010 - 17:11
Link
johnwhit wrote:
Best regards,
John
I doubt if you can do better than the Samyang 8mm for the money - it was a bit cheaper when I bought it. I sometimes regret selling it but realistically I get a lot more use from the Pentax 15mm Ltd not least because it is so small and portable that I usually have it with me when photo opportunities crop up.helios wrote:
I had the Falcon version of the Samyang 8mm (it is sold under a variety of names) and it certainly had an "A" setting. It was a good lens but rather bulky and after playing with the fisheye format for a bit I decided to sell it and other stuff to fund the acquisition of a Pentax 15mm Ltd which is small and light enough to go everywhere with me.
That's a good choice, I really like the DA15, but it's a little expensive right now, I don't use Fisheye lenses that often but I've been missing having one for the APS-C format, I think £212 is a reasonable price for a lens that will be used infrequently.I had the Falcon version of the Samyang 8mm (it is sold under a variety of names) and it certainly had an "A" setting. It was a good lens but rather bulky and after playing with the fisheye format for a bit I decided to sell it and other stuff to fund the acquisition of a Pentax 15mm Ltd which is small and light enough to go everywhere with me.
Best regards,
John
On the subject of LBA I am trying to conquer my addiction by resolving to sell an old lens every time I buy a new one. It does not really save money but the quality on my lenses has improved!
Archie
Archie
Posted 18/06/2010 - 19:03
Link
helios wrote:
I doubt if you can do better than the Samyang 8mm for the money - it was a bit cheaper when I bought it. I sometimes regret selling it but realistically I get a lot more use from the Pentax 15mm Ltd not least because it is so small and portable that I usually have it with me when photo opportunities crop up.
On the subject of LBA I am trying to conquer my addiction by resolving to sell an old lens every time I buy a new one. It does not really save money but the quality on my lenses has improved!
Archie
Hi Archie,I doubt if you can do better than the Samyang 8mm for the money - it was a bit cheaper when I bought it. I sometimes regret selling it but realistically I get a lot more use from the Pentax 15mm Ltd not least because it is so small and portable that I usually have it with me when photo opportunities crop up.
On the subject of LBA I am trying to conquer my addiction by resolving to sell an old lens every time I buy a new one. It does not really save money but the quality on my lenses has improved!
Archie
Thanks for your comments. I couldn't really justify the Pentax 10-17 price wise, although it's undoubtebly a fine somewhat unique lens. The Samyang really appeals to me, the DA15 and FA31 are on my wishlist, I'd love to own both these very fine lenses. The problem is I have the Sigma 10-20, Pentax FA28/2.8 and FA35/2 so I've basicly got that range covered and can't really justify the purchase of DA15 & FA31
I too have been selling off some of my older lenses as I purchase new but seem to have got to the point where I'm reluctant to let any more go, the replacement for the K-7 may change all that, until then I continue to use the K20D which I really enjoy.
Best regards,
John
Posted 18/06/2010 - 20:36
Link
Hi John,
As you have the Sigma 10-20 you really have the the rectilineal WA range well covered. The fisheye is rather fun though probably not used all that frequently. I am sure you would enjoy the Samyang 8mm and it is well worth the price. It is fairly big with a bulbous front element but no more I suspect than your Sigma (surmise as I have never used a Sigma 10-20).
Kind regards,
Archie
As you have the Sigma 10-20 you really have the the rectilineal WA range well covered. The fisheye is rather fun though probably not used all that frequently. I am sure you would enjoy the Samyang 8mm and it is well worth the price. It is fairly big with a bulbous front element but no more I suspect than your Sigma (surmise as I have never used a Sigma 10-20).
Kind regards,
Archie
Archie
Posted 18/06/2010 - 20:55
Link
Hi Archie,
thanks for the comment, it's roughly the same size as the Sigma as far as I can tell, but the Sigma lacks the bulbous front element and can be used with filters. I'm looking forward to using the Fiseye sometime in the not too distant future
Best regards,
John
thanks for the comment, it's roughly the same size as the Sigma as far as I can tell, but the Sigma lacks the bulbous front element and can be used with filters. I'm looking forward to using the Fiseye sometime in the not too distant future
Best regards,
John
Posted 20/06/2010 - 00:13
Link
johnwhit wrote:
Hi Daniel
what didn't you like?
I can live with manual focus and stop down metering, I still have K series primes. Shooting at F5.6 - f/11 will probably be the norm on such a lens for me. There's some very positive reviews, in fact I can't find a bad one The build quality sounds very impressive too. CA and purple fringing better than average for a fisheye, I shoot RAW so no problems there.
Regards,
John
Nothing much, to be honest. I wasn't trying it with the intention to buy it, they just had it in stock when I was there for the day, so I had a play. This was at LCE Colchester, not sure if they still have it, might be worth a ring?Hi Daniel
what didn't you like?
I can live with manual focus and stop down metering, I still have K series primes. Shooting at F5.6 - f/11 will probably be the norm on such a lens for me. There's some very positive reviews, in fact I can't find a bad one The build quality sounds very impressive too. CA and purple fringing better than average for a fisheye, I shoot RAW so no problems there.
Regards,
John
Resolution was okay, a bit soft at the edges, but I guess you'd expect that. I suppose I'm just a bit spoilt by the lenses I have now (you've got the DA*300, you know what I mean ). PF was evident, but I don't know how it compares to other fisheyes. I'll dig out the images and post a couple of samples in the next day or two if you want - too late to do it tonight.
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 20/06/2010 - 10:33
Link
Hi Dan
Thanks for the comment, I know what you mean by spoilt by lenses I thought I'd take a chance and clicked the Buy it Now button the other night, but for some reason Paypal is refusing to pay for it and I've had no contact from the seller. I even tried paying manually from my Paypal account, but no Ebay items showing for payment So I guess I'm just waiting.
Regards,
John
Thanks for the comment, I know what you mean by spoilt by lenses I thought I'd take a chance and clicked the Buy it Now button the other night, but for some reason Paypal is refusing to pay for it and I've had no contact from the seller. I even tried paying manually from my Paypal account, but no Ebay items showing for payment So I guess I'm just waiting.
Regards,
John
Posted 25/06/2010 - 18:29
Link
I've got a great location lined up for some test shots, but can't use it until Wednesday pm. Be gentle with me here, I'm no fan of Ken Rockwell, but...................I find this really interesting
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/8mm-f35.htm#proj
Regards,
John
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/8mm-f35.htm#proj
Regards,
John
Posted 25/06/2010 - 22:28
Link
helios wrote:
It is fairly big with a bulbous front element but no more I suspect than your Sigma (surmise as I have never used a Sigma 10-20).
The Sigma 10-20's front element protrudes slightly, but it will still take filters (ie it's nowhere near fisheye levels of stickoutage). The Sigma 8-16 on the other hand doesn't take filters, and the front element sticks out quite far.
It is fairly big with a bulbous front element but no more I suspect than your Sigma (surmise as I have never used a Sigma 10-20).
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


326 posts
16 years
Newcastle,
NSW,
Australia
My name is Sam-Joseph, and I have LBA......
Regards
Pentax K7, Sigma 17-70 f2.8-4.5, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 APO EX, Sigma 70-300 APO, Sigma 1.4x TC, Vivitar 2x TC. Takumar 135mm f2.5, SMC Pentax A 50mm 1:1.7, SMC Pentax -M 1:4 200mm, Pentax X70