Ladybird

coker
Posted 25/11/2013 - 19:26 Link
Snapped this just a while ago & am disappointed with the sharpness of the image.

Set-up was:
K5, 100mm D FA Macro, iso 160.

Pentax Auto Bellows M, 150mm extension.

Lens stopped-down with double cable release to f22.

Pentax AF 080c ring light.

Focus using bellows stage, then the lens' focus ring in live view, very carefully!

Slightly cropped in PSE11, levels adj., sharpened.

Shot in JPEG, I can download the original out-of-camera, if it would help.






Comment Image



Your thoughts on where I've gone wrong / could improve would be appreciated!

Roger.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Blythman
Posted 25/11/2013 - 19:32 Link
Don't know how much diffraction would soften it at f22 Roger?
Alan


PPG
Flickr
bettyswolloks
Posted 25/11/2013 - 19:33 Link
The bellows maybe? Never used them so I cant really comment on the impact they have of IQ. And by f22 would the lens be going soft at that end? Have a look at the MTF chart here.
One day you'll find, 10yrs have got behind you.
Edited by bettyswolloks: 25/11/2013 - 19:34
davidstorm
Posted 25/11/2013 - 19:41 Link
This will be diffraction Roger, probably not anything to do with your technique!

Regards
David
Flickr

Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu

Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs
coker
Posted 25/11/2013 - 20:04 Link
Thanks, all.

Diffraction it is, then!

This, at f5.6, single shot.
Has to be focus-stack!


Comment Image




This creature, sadly, has been injured. The yellow staining is its blood, I believe.


Thanks for your pointing me in the right direction, Combine ZP, here I come.....!


Roger.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Mike-P
Posted 25/11/2013 - 21:00 Link
Definitely diffraction.

I have a MP-E65mm macro lens for my 7D which is 1:5x magnification (basically a lens with built in macro tubes). I can shoot around f12/16 at 1:1 but if I go in further (say 1:3) then I have to use f8 to get decent sharpness.

For ages I thought it was either me or the lens causing soft shots but I am happier since I found out about the diffraction.
Stuey
Posted 25/11/2013 - 21:37 Link
Is that one of those johny foreigner invader types of lady bird/bugs that everyone seems to be unhappy about :

Sorry - I can't help with the technique side of things
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link
coker
Posted 25/11/2013 - 22:14 Link
Yes, Stuey, I think it may well be!

Just come back after supper...
& it's wandered off!

Oh well, there'll be another one along in a minute!

Thanks for the help, everyone.

Appreciated.

Roger.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
Sean282
Posted 27/11/2013 - 20:41 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Definitely diffraction.

I have a MP-E65mm macro lens for my 7D which is 1:5x magnification (basically a lens with built in macro tubes). I can shoot around f12/16 at 1:1 but if I go in further (say 1:3) then I have to use f8 to get decent sharpness.

For ages I thought it was either me or the lens causing soft shots but I am happier since I found out about the diffraction.
Would love a Pentax equivalent
Stuey
Posted 27/11/2013 - 21:02 Link
coker wrote:
Yes, Stuey, I think it may well be!

Just come back after supper...
& it's wandered off!

Oh well, there'll be another one along in a minute!

Thanks for the help, everyone.

Appreciated.

Roger.
Woo hoo - I thought I had correctly identified it

Considering that they are not well liked and thought to be a threat, none of the websites I have just checked recommend stepping on them when found
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo