Kx/K5 wedding
Posted 17/10/2011 - 23:39
Link
Hello, an amazing recovery! I wouldn't have the nerve to shoot a wedding and would no doubt get myself shot. Seriously good to see what can be recovered from what initially looks beyond hope.
I'm especially impressed with the shots you shared via the link which had the bright blue sky as the background. I struggle to get good shots in such situations so I can only think you have mastered the fill in flash or have found an excellent way of recovering in PP.
I'm especially impressed with the shots you shared via the link which had the bright blue sky as the background. I struggle to get good shots in such situations so I can only think you have mastered the fill in flash or have found an excellent way of recovering in PP.
K10D,KX, DA 18-55, DA 17-70 AL(IF) SDM, DA*50-135, Sigma 70-300, DAL 50-300mm, Kenko 1.5x, loads of SD cards and even more optimism
Posted 18/10/2011 - 18:51
Link
Thanks, no fill flash on the ones outside though. All PP (apart from the really dark shot) were done with 'auto contrast' and a bit of fill using picasa. One of the bridesmaids is doing all the proper editing as a wedding gift, she wanted to do the whole thing, but had other duties Don't be too impressed either, your Kx will perform nearly equal miracles, for an 'entry level' dslr it really shows how things have moved on and what can be achieved. I was going to sell mine after this event, now I am not sure....
Posted 18/10/2011 - 19:40
Link
lets see a bigger picture.
Posted 19/10/2011 - 16:15
Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
...but the pictures in general look quite noisy with compression artefacts...
Too much compression before uploading to the web will do that to any photo regardless of how spectacular and amazing the original might look. Hopefully these super compressed versions is not what the wedding couple are actually getting....but the pictures in general look quite noisy with compression artefacts...
As for burnt highlight, that picassa link isn't even working for me so I can't see!
My Flickr • Pentax K-5 • K-5 II • Sigma 8-16mm F/4.5-5.6 DC HSM • Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD ASL • SMC Pentax-DA* 50-135mm F/2.8 ED [IF] SDM • SMC Pentax-DA 55-300mm F/4-5.8 ED • SMC Pentax-DA 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 ED AL [IF] WR • Vivitar 100mm F/3.5 Macro AF • Metz Mecablitz 58 AF-2
Posted 19/10/2011 - 20:56
Link
I think you did very well for an amateur. The lighting may not be perfect, but the whole series presents a nice remembrance of the happy occassion.
Best regards
Terry
K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Terry
K20D, Optio I10, DA 18-55 1:3.5-5.6 AL II, A 1:1.7/50, D FA 1:2.8/100 Macro, Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 APO DG Macro, Pentax AF 360FGZ
Posted 20/10/2011 - 10:23
Link
If I'd shot a wedding, I'd be very happy with results like that. So much potential for disaster! I think you did very well
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


283 posts
18 years
West Sussex,
UK
flash failure:
Recovered!
Anyway, very happy with the K5, it did all the things I asked of it. But then, so did the Kx, I have done a Kx wedding before (with EPL1) and it was fine as well. I just need to either give in and trust the ISO of the K5 or get to grips with flash!
Quick pics on picasa