K5 + sigma 150-500mm
You also have the extra pixels which means cropping images down still retains lots of detail.
Hope this helps.
If you shoot, as I do, wildlife in woodland as well, the ISO performance is also a positive - I can keep taking pictures at dusk now, which wasn't an option before!
I spent yesterday trying to get some red kites around here - and the focusing and 'hit rate' were SO much better than the K10D. I'm just off out to have another go!
Hope you take the plunge! I'm certainlu glad I did!!
Martyn
My trip to London this week may end up with me in Watford I fear!
well to the bank balance that is
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


497 posts
17 years
Im currently still using my K20d with my Sigma 150-500mm for wildlife photos. Im thinking of upgrading to a K5 but Im wondering if there will be significant improvements to do so. DOes anyone use the K5 and Sigma 150-500mm for wildlife? And do you find the AF better for action/in flight shots? I imagine the good high ISO perfomance helps with shutter speed when forced to use f8.0 for fully sharp images, is this so?
Sorry for all the questions and thanks in advance