K3 review on DPR

tyronet2000
Posted 12/04/2014 - 09:55 Link
The review I find annoying is when checking 3rd party lenses. Invariably they have used a Canon for the tests and it's difficult to find an independent review where a Pentax camera has been used for the tests. As we know, all cameras are equal but some cameras are more equal than others
Regards
Stan

PPG
Edited by tyronet2000: 12/04/2014 - 09:55
SteveLedger
Posted 12/04/2014 - 21:42 Link
richandfleur wrote:
Lower marks for video again. Is it mechanical stabilisation for video or that budget 'movie SR' electronic version?
The later, unfortunately.
dcweather
Posted 12/04/2014 - 22:56 Link
richandfleur wrote:
dcweather wrote:
vjacesslav wrote:
YES Finally 83% Gold award
Yes, couldn't really not be. Begrudging undertone at times I thought.
e.g. "It fits nicely in the hand but is considerably heavier than its mirrorless competitors." Well blow me down with a feather!
Exactly. How does it compare to other DSLR's? Are they going to add that line to every DSLR review, from all brands, now?!
-----------------------------------------------------------
Not as easy to put in your pocket as some compacts either Got to be worth knocking a couple of points off for
ronniemac
Posted 12/04/2014 - 23:16 Link
Time for something a little more uplifting.

I'm sure it will have been mentioned previously, but skip exactly 5 minutes into this YouTube video review to hear a review of the K-3 by someone who knows something about DSLR's. OK it's not a review, just the best and worst of 2013. He also did a fine review of the camera itself ..... in the field!

Big thanks to Chris Nichols from the Camera Store in Canada.
Edited by ronniemac: 12/04/2014 - 23:17
Dave-L
Posted 24/04/2014 - 19:30 Link
richandfleur wrote:
Lower marks for video again. Agree that it hinted as being much better for video with the external mic and headphone sockets. Is it mechanical stabilisation for video or that budget 'movie SR' electronic version? Improving the video (and therefore overall score) would be comparatively very easy.
The DP review does seem to mess up in an important aspect of K-3 video quality. It says:
Quote:

Sample 3

This third sample shows an example of a pan, conducted in TAv mode, with the shutter speed set to 1/60th of a second and the aperture set to F8. The camera then adjusts ISO to maintain scene brightness. Focus is fixed at the beginning of the clip. Although there's only minimal sign of rolling shutter, the camera struggles to convey movement well, with considerable juddering in middle portion of the clip. Movie SR is off for this clip.
There is no juddering (implying drop frames) in the clip - they should get a better computer or monitor to view it on. If they see any, it's due to slow video processing of the h.264 video in their video or player. I double checked for drop frames, frame by frame, there aren't any.

If they are referring to the part where there is smearing, just after halfway as the cars are passing at their closest, well I suggest that the camera is too close to a fast moving object with insufficient pan speed and/or steadyness at that point. I can't see any similarly priced DSLR with the same settings doing any better under those conditions.
K3/K5/10-17fisheye/15mmDA Ltd/18-55WR/55-300DA/100DFAMacroWR/50F1.4M/200F4M/DA*200F2.8/DA*300F4/DA*50-135/DA*60-250/Mitsuki 400F5.6/others.
Edited by Dave-L: 24/04/2014 - 19:35

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo