K100D and K110D
Posted 07/06/2006 - 07:44
Link
As far as i can see, the *istDS2 becomes the K100D and the *istDL becomes the K110D. The added feature is ant-shake technology and of course a new name!
Best regards, John
Posted 07/06/2006 - 10:40
Link
As far as I can see the K100D is similar to the DL2 with the pentamirror viewfinder rather than the pentaprism on the DS2.
The specs on the K110D seem to be very similar to the K100D but with image stabilisation.
The specs on the K110D seem to be very similar to the K100D but with image stabilisation.
Posted 07/06/2006 - 13:58
Link
pros/cons of pentamirror against pentaprism?
I *think* my Ist D has the Pentaprism, is this the better more expensive version or the older outdated one?
I'm just a little confused as to why Pentax appear to have re-released a couple of it's existing cameras with just one extra feature (and still no twin wheel system!)
I just hope the new top end D-SLR is worth waiting for - i've now spent too much on decent glass to want to think about swapping for a 30D...
I *think* my Ist D has the Pentaprism, is this the better more expensive version or the older outdated one?
I'm just a little confused as to why Pentax appear to have re-released a couple of it's existing cameras with just one extra feature (and still no twin wheel system!)
I just hope the new top end D-SLR is worth waiting for - i've now spent too much on decent glass to want to think about swapping for a 30D...
Posted 07/06/2006 - 14:37
Link
Mirrors induce problems because the light is refracted twice, once when it enters the glass of the mirror (at an angle), and a second time when it exits, having bounced off the silvering at the back of the glass.
With a penta-prism, the light enters at a right-angle, bounces around inside, then exits again at a right angle. So, no refracton.
The prism on the D is excellent. But the penta-mirrors on the cheaper Pentax DSLRs are considered much better than those on bodies from Nikon and the copier-cam company.
G
With a penta-prism, the light enters at a right-angle, bounces around inside, then exits again at a right angle. So, no refracton.
The prism on the D is excellent. But the penta-mirrors on the cheaper Pentax DSLRs are considered much better than those on bodies from Nikon and the copier-cam company.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 07/06/2006 - 16:33
Link
I have looked throught the viewfinders on some of Pentax's competitors and cannot believe that people buy these cameras. Compared to the Pentax, they are dreadful.
Best regards, John
Posted 08/06/2006 - 10:58
Link
Surely the mirrors are surface silvered? Therefore not prone to refraction? However, there are more air/solid surfaces than in a prism, which I guess could cause degradation, and is a mirrored surface as smooth as a polished glass one?
Dan
Dan
Posted 08/06/2006 - 11:05
Link
Think about it. To bounce off the silvered surface at the back, the light has first to go through a layer of glass - at an angle. Then it comes back out again, at an angle. This happens several times before it exits through the view-finder.
With a prism, the light enters once, at right angles, then bounces the required number of times WITHIN THE GLASS, then exits at a right angle.
G
With a prism, the light enters once, at right angles, then bounces the required number of times WITHIN THE GLASS, then exits at a right angle.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 08/06/2006 - 11:14
Link
George,
Dan meant this: http://photonotes.org/cgi-bin/entry.pl?id=Frontsilveredmirror
My wife has an MZ-10, which is a penta-mirror, and there's not a great difference. As John rightly says, the Pentax viewfinders are lovely (especially compared to the competition!).
Matt
Dan meant this: http://photonotes.org/cgi-bin/entry.pl?id=Frontsilveredmirror
My wife has an MZ-10, which is a penta-mirror, and there's not a great difference. As John rightly says, the Pentax viewfinders are lovely (especially compared to the competition!).
Matt
Posted 08/06/2006 - 12:37
Link
I stand corrected.
G
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 08/06/2006 - 20:31
Link
Quote:
I'm just a little confused as to why Pentax appear to have re-released a couple of it's existing cameras with just one extra feature (and still no twin wheel system!)
I seriously second that comment!!!!! In a LARGE way!I'm just a little confused as to why Pentax appear to have re-released a couple of it's existing cameras with just one extra feature (and still no twin wheel system!)
Give us the twin wheels again PLEASE!!
Posted 08/06/2006 - 21:53
Link
Quote:
Give us the twin wheels again PLEASE!!
You will get your turn with the K10D. Do not worry about that. Dual wheel is by far the best way...
dexteruk wrote:
I'm just a little confused as to why Pentax appear to have re-released a couple of it's existing cameras with just one extra feature (and still no twin wheel system!)
I seriously second that comment!!!!! In a LARGE way!I'm just a little confused as to why Pentax appear to have re-released a couple of it's existing cameras with just one extra feature (and still no twin wheel system!)
Give us the twin wheels again PLEASE!!
Plane Tax!!!
Posted 08/06/2006 - 22:01
Link
Quote:
You will get your turn with the K10D. Do not worry about that. Dual wheel is by far the best way...
There speaks a PZ1-P owner. Hope it's still working fine!You will get your turn with the K10D. Do not worry about that. Dual wheel is by far the best way...
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 09/06/2006 - 08:30
Link
K10D?
i'm guessing that's the current guess for a name of the un-named new 10mp D-Slr?
i really hope it's an *IST D but with 10mp and faster write speed/ bigger buffer. Then i'll buy one
i'm guessing that's the current guess for a name of the un-named new 10mp D-Slr?
i really hope it's an *IST D but with 10mp and faster write speed/ bigger buffer. Then i'll buy one
Posted 09/06/2006 - 10:52
Link
having owned a copier-cam company D300 (love that term george shall use it allways hehe) the firts thing you notice is the lack of information in the veiw finder as with the nikon units
the one thing i hope thay do incorperate into the new MZ-D call it what you will is the slopping top plate used on the MZS which is so easy to use without moving from the veiwfinder
anyway my name is on the first order with jessops carnt wait to get my sticky mits on it
i may even go to photokina and have a play
the one thing i hope thay do incorperate into the new MZ-D call it what you will is the slopping top plate used on the MZS which is so easy to use without moving from the veiwfinder
anyway my name is on the first order with jessops carnt wait to get my sticky mits on it
i may even go to photokina and have a play
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


106 posts
20 years
I can see the K100D has the advantage of the anti-shake, but can't quite work out what the K110D actually does? It seems that between the *Ist DL, DS and DS2 pentax has saturated one area of basic SLRs, yet it's just released another.
Does the K110D have *any* advantages of the previous DL/DS range?
Also - apart from the anti-shake i don't see that the K100D does anything extra - especially when compared to the *IST D (in fact it seems that until the un-named new SLR is released that pentax has made a lot of cameras that have no real advantage over the D - the possible exception is USB 2 - but i'll happily live without that all the time it's got the great two dial Av/Tv system)