Juvenile bird
Posted 27/06/2009 - 09:34
Link
Martin, pretty nice shots, love the way it looks as if its posing for you .
Sorry can't help in identifying the bird but I was deeply interested in seeing the difference just choosing different settings it makes to an image. When I noticed that the shots were more or less of the same moment and spot I was keen on checking the EXIF, and this is really a brillian example for any learner/newbie/improver to grasp the fantastic effects of choosing different settings and get the result on the image.
I presume there was only the difference of around 40mm in focal length between the two images but its the rest of the EXIF that would be very interesting to dwell on and help some learners to see the effect one gets by manipulating the settings on the camera.
I know someone to whom I am going to point to this thread to help understand the cause and effect of changing the settings to manipulate the outcome.
Just a thought here please, would you mind just adding the EXIF on both the images, so that it would help the viewers when discussing about it. I personally can see the EXIF from my browser but I am not sure if all of them who would be interested in checking it would know how to do it. Being learners and improvers themselves this would be an added benefit.
Thanks for the images, hope someone identifies them. Would be nice to know what bird it is.
EDITED: ADDED REQUEST TO MARTIN TO ADD THE EXIF WITH THE IMAGES
Sorry can't help in identifying the bird but I was deeply interested in seeing the difference just choosing different settings it makes to an image. When I noticed that the shots were more or less of the same moment and spot I was keen on checking the EXIF, and this is really a brillian example for any learner/newbie/improver to grasp the fantastic effects of choosing different settings and get the result on the image.
I presume there was only the difference of around 40mm in focal length between the two images but its the rest of the EXIF that would be very interesting to dwell on and help some learners to see the effect one gets by manipulating the settings on the camera.
I know someone to whom I am going to point to this thread to help understand the cause and effect of changing the settings to manipulate the outcome.
Just a thought here please, would you mind just adding the EXIF on both the images, so that it would help the viewers when discussing about it. I personally can see the EXIF from my browser but I am not sure if all of them who would be interested in checking it would know how to do it. Being learners and improvers themselves this would be an added benefit.
Thanks for the images, hope someone identifies them. Would be nice to know what bird it is.
EDITED: ADDED REQUEST TO MARTIN TO ADD THE EXIF WITH THE IMAGES
Amin Photo Gallery
Posted 27/06/2009 - 09:39
Link
I thought you did not do little bird pictures. But when you do you do it very well. That first one is a stunner.
Barrie - Too Old To Die Young
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
https://pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/barrieforbes
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189482630@N03/
Posted 27/06/2009 - 09:54
Link
The first shot was taken against a background from a dark green wall of foliage. The sun coming from the left was barely hitting the bird.
I had to raise the ISO to get a acceptable shutter speed.
For the second picture I turned to another angle so I had a clear sky as a background and the bird would have been in more even light. I had to compensate for the sky, otherwise the bird would have been under exposed.
ISO has been lowered to 100.
HIH,
Martin.
I had to raise the ISO to get a acceptable shutter speed.
For the second picture I turned to another angle so I had a clear sky as a background and the bird would have been in more even light. I had to compensate for the sky, otherwise the bird would have been under exposed.
ISO has been lowered to 100.
HIH,
Martin.
Posted 27/06/2009 - 10:10
Link
That's great Martin. That really is helpful in understanding the tehnical side of those images. I am sure lots of us will benefit immensely from that.
Thanks again
Thanks again
Amin Photo Gallery
Posted 27/06/2009 - 11:20
Link
bforbes wrote:
I thought you did not do little bird pictures. But when you do you do it very well. That first one is a stunner.
Thanks....I do bird pictures, I just don't do or show them that often I thought you did not do little bird pictures. But when you do you do it very well. That first one is a stunner.
Martin.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2397 posts
19 years
The Netherlands
1/500 sec at F5,6. SR on. ISO 400. Spot metering.
1/200 sec at F5,6 (+ 1,7 ev to compensate for bright backlight)SR on. ISO 100. Spot metering
K10D with DA 50-200. BTW...can someone identify this chap for me?
Martin.
edit: Exif added as requested
Martin.
Curious about my photography?? Just Follow the Light.