Is it worth buying ?

suzzypoo
Posted 01/11/2012 - 20:59 Link
Hi everyone, I wondered if anyone can help. I have the pentax smc M 50mm f1.7 lens and have been offered the Pentax smc M 50mm f1.2 for £10. Is it worth getting this lens ? I know £10 is nothing but is there a difference between the lenses ?

Thanks
Suzanne x
darkskies
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:07 Link
Take it. Then have a look how much you could sell it for!
This space deliberately left blank.
suzzypoo
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:10 Link
Is it not worth keeping ? whats the difference between the 1.2 and 1.7
Suzanne x
Mike-P
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:11 Link
Are you sure it's not the f2 version .. they are quite often mixed up as it says 1:2 on the front.
suzzypoo
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:16 Link
oh bloody hell, yes it is
Is it still worth having alongside the 1.7 ?
Suzanne x
darkskies
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:20 Link
No! Not really. Be careful!

Well done, Mike!
This space deliberately left blank.
suzzypoo
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:23 Link
Thankyou, much appreciated. That will teach me to last minute bid on Ebay before reading the ad properly
Suzanne x
Edited by suzzypoo: 01/11/2012 - 21:23
darkskies
Posted 01/11/2012 - 21:39 Link
I thought you had been offered the lens, not buying it on ebay.

Most people know what a lens is worth (though some slip through the net) so, as the saying goes, if it looks too good to be true it probably is.

Here's a good place to see how lenses are regarded, both Pentax and 3rd party lenses. Don't take much notice of the prices, as they are an indication rather than accurate.

link
This space deliberately left blank.
suzzypoo
Posted 02/11/2012 - 00:30 Link
I just couldnt be bothered explaining about ebay ect... I was still able to buy the lens for £10 so not really sure it matters.
Suzanne x
Mike-P
Posted 02/11/2012 - 09:19 Link
No harm done, you would get your money back just advertising it here on the forum. The front cap is worth a few quid just on it's own.
Algernon
Posted 02/11/2012 - 10:05 Link
The front and rear caps are often worth more than the lens...
in fact I might stop buying lenses and just buy front and
rear caps!

-
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Mike-P
Posted 02/11/2012 - 10:06 Link
If it's the one I think it is then there was no rear cap.
Smeggypants
Posted 03/11/2012 - 02:11 Link
suzzypoo wrote:
Hi everyone, I wondered if anyone can help. I have the pentax smc M 50mm f1.7 lens and have been offered the Pentax smc M 50mm f1.2 for £10. Is it worth getting this lens ? I know £10 is nothing but is there a difference between the lenses ?

Thanks
Yes there's a HUGE difference between the 1.7 and 1.2

The silky narrow DOF shots you get from the 50/1.2 wide open are gorgeous.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
johnriley
Posted 03/11/2012 - 06:24 Link
I have never seen an f/1.2 offered for £10, but plenty of badly described f/2 lenses for £10. The designation 1:2 on the lenses can cause confusion. 1:1.2 is something else, and one for £10 should get any Pentax User rather excited at the prospect.
Best regards, John
Mal
Posted 17/11/2012 - 00:54 Link
If it was a f1.2 i would offer you £200 in the hope you would bite my hand off , because f1.2 is worth a lot more

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo