Iris Cleaning - The final chapter (I hope)
Posted 26/04/2011 - 11:39
Link
It sounds like a success to me! Domiplans always did have a very poor reputation for IQ (hence them being so cheap) so I think your results are very much in line with how the lens performed when it was new.
I bet your friend will be chuffed anyway.
I bet your friend will be chuffed anyway.
Joining the Q
Posted 26/04/2011 - 12:01
Link
Thanks again Hefty - At least it is actually working now. Not as well as I had hoped, but as you said
regards
Bernard
Quote:
Domiplans always did have a very poor reputation for IQ
I was a little puzzled by the tapered image particulary as I spent ages squaring everything up - I wonder if it's because I dropped out the back lens and haven't quite got it aligned - it fits in a hole about 1mm bigger than its mount and there's adjustment in the grub screws. I simply tried to centralise itDomiplans always did have a very poor reputation for IQ
regards
Bernard
Posted 26/04/2011 - 13:55
Link
That is a possibility, but I wouldn't waste too much time trying to make a silk purse from a sow's ear if I were you - a Domiplan is never going to be winning awards for fidelity.
Assuming your friend's camera is an M42 mount then there are a couple of other lenses out there, that can be had for around £10, that would give much better IQ than the Domiplan. The first that springs to mind is the Helios-44 (Russian Biotar copy, supplied with various Zenit SLRs, 58mm f/2), the other is the Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 (usually one of the "budget" lenses on Praktica SLRs). For slightly more money (£15-20) he could have a Takumar 55mm f/1.8 or a Pentacon 50mm f/1.8.
If you're wondering what to buy him for Christmas this year then any of the above would work with his current body and offer a serious upgrade on the Domiplan.
Assuming your friend's camera is an M42 mount then there are a couple of other lenses out there, that can be had for around £10, that would give much better IQ than the Domiplan. The first that springs to mind is the Helios-44 (Russian Biotar copy, supplied with various Zenit SLRs, 58mm f/2), the other is the Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 (usually one of the "budget" lenses on Praktica SLRs). For slightly more money (£15-20) he could have a Takumar 55mm f/1.8 or a Pentacon 50mm f/1.8.
If you're wondering what to buy him for Christmas this year then any of the above would work with his current body and offer a serious upgrade on the Domiplan.
Joining the Q
Posted 26/04/2011 - 15:13
Link
Quote:
Takumar 55mm f/1.8
That was the lens fitted to one of my first SLRs (a Pentax, but I can't remember the model). It was second hand in the early 70's as I recall and I took it everywhere. I only gave it away some years ago when I had a DSLR for my 60th as it was only collecting dust. I didn't think it was worth anything - little did I know.Takumar 55mm f/1.8
I'll be taking the Domiplan back tonight - I'm reasonably sure he'll be happy with it - I'm equally sure that he would be most offended if I gave him a replacement lens, even for Christmas.
He has photos he took in Malaya (B&W - or rather faded brown and yelow). How he did it in a POW camp I'll never know as it's a subject he'll never discuss and Japanese cameras /lenses are an abhorance to him.
Sorry I'm getting maudlin.
regards
Bernard
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1776 posts
17 years
Burton upon Trent
I've now stripped and rebuilt the lens and am moderately happy with the results. The blades are not as "snappy" as I expected but moving freely at least. I suspect the return spring is a bit soft- not surpising after 40 odd years I suppose.
Despite Hefty's warnings about removing the blades this was imposed upon me when they all fell out so I simply picked them up with tweezers, put them into a small dish of surcical spirits whils I attended to the rest of the lens assy. After picking them out and leaving to dry on kitchen paper I found re-assembly fiddly but not too onerous, just as well because they fell out several times further. [Method-Set the aperture to 2.8 and proceed clockwise, gently easing the last one into place].
I was unable to disassemble the front and middle lens or the aperture setting ring, but they looked clean anyway (curiously there is a small red fibre between the lenses but it stayed at the edge no matter what I did.)
Because of the multistart thread I had to try several times to realign the scales (each time manging to dislodge the iris blades) but eventually everything went back together with a deligtful bonus - no bits left over.
Not wanting to wait for prints to come back I set the lens into a 7mm extention tube, using a 40mmx30mm brass washer to depress the auto pin and mounted the lens via a M42/K adapter on my K10D and took the following shots, the first at f2.8 and the 2nd at f8. :-
[IMG]http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff444/Frogherder/IMGP5517a.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i1236.photobucket.com/albums/ff444/Frogherder/IMGP5518a.jpg[/IMG]
On my 15x12 screen they don't look the best in the world but I suppose good enough for 6x4 prints
Bernard