Interesting K5 Review
Posted 05/01/2011 - 15:01
Link
Interesting, although possibly aimed more at beginners. Although I do think having an excessively soft opening image damages his credibility somewhat
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 05/01/2011 - 19:04
Link
cheers for that, had a play on a k5 today which my friend has borrowed from a shop it a pre production model and i must say i realy liked it alot more than the k7 there is just more to it, and the af is defo alot faster than the k7 and the low light is way better, and also iso 6400 looks great.
Posted 05/01/2011 - 20:50
Link
Interesting that Practical Photography only rated it a 7/10. Never mind, they are all probably Canon users anyway.....
Some Cameras
Posted 05/01/2011 - 21:48
Link
Offertonhatter wrote:
Interesting that Practical Photography only rated it a 7/10. Never mind, they are all probably Canon users anyway.....
Probably got marked down because their L-series lenses wouldnt fit...
Interesting that Practical Photography only rated it a 7/10. Never mind, they are all probably Canon users anyway.....
Posted 05/01/2011 - 21:59
Link
NeilP wrote:
You are probably right.........
Offertonhatter wrote:
Interesting that Practical Photography only rated it a 7/10. Never mind, they are all probably Canon users anyway.....
Probably got marked down because their L-series lenses wouldnt fit...Interesting that Practical Photography only rated it a 7/10. Never mind, they are all probably Canon users anyway.....
Some Cameras
Posted 06/01/2011 - 00:09
Link
johnriley wrote:
Two posts removed. That was over the line.
Darn it. I always miss the good stuff.Two posts removed. That was over the line.
hehehehe
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 06/01/2011 - 00:21
Link
Don wrote:
hehehehe
I have the same problem. It's likely because we live too far from the Greenwich meridian. John has plenty of time to remove them before they reach us.
johnriley wrote:
Two posts removed. That was over the line.
Darn it. I always miss the good stuff.Two posts removed. That was over the line.
hehehehe
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
2342 posts
16 years
Storbritannia
http://www.pixiq.com/article/test-1
My viewfinder is 576,000,000 pixels.
My other viewfinder is 5.76,000,000.
www.exaggeratedperspectives.com