Gorillas

pink
Posted 16/06/2010 - 17:20 Link
these Gorillas where taken at bush gardens in America so I'm not able to return until next year to retake the images

the male look's out of focus to me but I don't under stand it really because i was on a tripod and using a cable and there was no glass or netting to get in the way of focusing. out of focus or not I love this image but anyway please look and advise for next time.

Male Black and white

Comment Image



Female colour

Comment Image


Hope you enjoy

James
My Fluidr

"To see in colour is a delight for the eye, But to see in black and white is a delight for the soul" ANDRI HERY
thoughton
Posted 17/06/2010 - 00:14 Link
Hmm, I'd say the first one is suffering from camera shake (look at those white strands of stuff on his shoulder). If you've got a wobbly tripod or something the 2nd one is probably the same problem but to a lesser extent. That, or they're both just out of focus.

I suppose it's also possible that it's just a very soft lens and you've cropped a lot - what lens did you use?
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
pink
Posted 17/06/2010 - 09:09 Link
I use my 55-300mm on these shots as I left my tamron 70 200 mm f2.8 at home so I think next time i will buy a sigma 500mm because I've looked at all the gorilla shots and all of them are soft focus.

James
My Fluidr

"To see in colour is a delight for the eye, But to see in black and white is a delight for the soul" ANDRI HERY
Edited by pink: 17/06/2010 - 09:12
bwlchmawr
Posted 17/06/2010 - 09:25 Link
James, you need to really splurge and get a £1.56 70-210 Sigma like mine!!! Every one a winner (ahem!)

What a pity, they're so nicely seen and frames, too. And their expressions... The trouble is this kind of thing needs to be sharp.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
Edited by bwlchmawr: 17/06/2010 - 09:26
thoughton
Posted 17/06/2010 - 10:08 Link
pink wrote:
I use my 55-300mm on these shots
Hmmm well that rules out a lens problem, even a 1:1 crop - from what is by all accounts the best Pentax-fix consumer zoom - should be sharper than these are.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
robbie_d
Posted 17/06/2010 - 10:11 Link
Cable release wasn't pulling at the camera a bit?
If you can't say something nice about Pentax, you won't say anything at all.

Apparently.
Algernon
Posted 17/06/2010 - 10:15 Link
The Pentax 55-300mm is a very sharp lens, but it has to be held very steady and the focus has to be right. Same applies to all lenses over 200mm. Also the light looks good so you could have probably got away with f/11 for increased DOF.

Algi
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
Pentaxophile
Posted 17/06/2010 - 10:31 Link
I did not find the 55-300 to be very good over 250mm (although it's probably still better than the competition) but even so, unless these are heavily cropped, I doubt it's the lens. Maybe the subject moved?
Tobio
Posted 17/06/2010 - 10:35 Link
Hi!

Good images despite the slight blurriness. Perhaps you used a bit too slow shutter speed? The da 55-300 is a pretty good lens in my opinion, though there can be better and worse copies.

Regards,
Tobio
Best regards,
Tobio

K20d with Tamron AF 90mm f/2.8 Di SP macro , smc da 18-55 mm, smc da 50-200 mm and smc da 55-300 mm + Metz 58 af-1. Editing with Pentax Photolab, Gimp and Paint.net.
Edited by Tobio: 17/06/2010 - 10:37
pink
Posted 17/06/2010 - 19:29 Link
ok I would like your advice on a bigger lens

should i go for the sigma 120-400mm or the 150-500mm

and what prices should I expect to pay second hand and before every one say's "I have one you can buy", I'm just window shopping I will not be looking for one until after Christmas

James
My Fluidr

"To see in colour is a delight for the eye, But to see in black and white is a delight for the soul" ANDRI HERY
Edited by pink: 17/06/2010 - 19:31

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo