Getting to know a photo, one pixel at a time..
Now Sue is brilliant at things like this, and the last restoration she did took her about 35 minutes....incredible.....However, she did not go to pixel level, so that makes a major difference.
thanks.. when I do another it will take a lot less time, as it was mainly trial and error to find out which technique worked best. I've got a colour one to do, but there is a lot less damage although the areas are bigger. I think that'll be cutting and pasting similar areas in the main, and a little detailing elsewhere in the busier parts of the image. All good fun. It is excruciating though, but when you get a decent sized chunk done and compare it to the original, which I had side by side throughout, it keeps you going. The sense of acheivement with anything like this is the reward at the end.
I won't be doing too many though, hopefully.
Cheers
Liam
"Make your hands respond to what your mind demands." Jesse James
Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward. Look for the 'ah-ha'. Ernst Haas
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


931 posts
20 years
Bracknell Berkshire
I've been away from the nattering for a few days.. been busy with a little photo reconstruction. The silver had disintegrated in places and there were a few crease marks. It's very tedious work requiring lots of man hours, and when I started, I had no idea how to do it..
This is the original photo, from C1948 ish..
..and this is what I done did with a week of messing around.. I suppose about 15-20 hours all told..
I know it's not perfect, but as a first attempt I don't think I did too bad. There are probably easier ways of doing it, but I basically blew it up to 400% on screen from an original scan size of 2036x1526 and painted in all (most of) the missing pixels by hand. I used a 3x3 pixel brush set to either 1% or 3% opacity depending on whether it was a dark or light area and just added a bit at a time until the missing areas matched (or as close as possible) the surrounding pixels. I altered the contrast selectively in a couple of areas afterwards. One thing I forgot to do with this example before posting is to greyscale it, which I'll do later. It was scanned on a colour scanner and in places there are hints of reds, blues and yellows where there shouldn't be.
I now know why this sort of work is so expensive to get done, judging by the time involved.
Now I'm going to get the gear ready for a trip to.. maybe South Wales, hopefully there's still some snow.. and try for the buzzard pictures that I didn't get a fortnight ago. I'll probably use the 300 prime on a couple of 2x converters (an 1800 lens.. ) and see what happens.
Still, before that, I really ought to get dressed.
Cheers
Liam
"Make your hands respond to what your mind demands." Jesse James
Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward. Look for the 'ah-ha'. Ernst Haas