Gannets at Bempton

jvs
Posted 30/05/2011 - 21:53 Link
Went back to Bempton at the weekend to see if I could improve on the first lot now I have removed the UV filter from my lens. The light once the rain stopped was great. If you don't like gannets, this is not for you! All shots undoctored apart from a little noise removal and no. 6 which is cropped. All comments/suggestions for processing improvements welcome as always.
1
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9122.jpg[/IMG]
2
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9304.jpg[/IMG]
3
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9319.jpg[/IMG]
4
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9187.jpg[/IMG]
5
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9357.jpg[/IMG]
6
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9361crop.jpg[/IMG]
7
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9338.jpg[/IMG]
8
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9125a.jpg[/IMG]
9
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9363.jpg[/IMG]
10
[IMG]http://i1095.photobucket.com/albums/i479/jvs49/Gannets/IMGP9160-1.jpg[/IMG]
John
Edited by jvs: 30/05/2011 - 22:13
ems82
Posted 30/05/2011 - 22:14 Link
5,6,8 and 10 are lovely well shot.
Emma
"Photography is a way of feeling, of touching, of loving. What you have caught on film is captured forever... it remembers little things, long after you have forgotten everything." Aaron Siskind
Bodies K20D, LTL 3, K1000d
Lenses Pentax 50mm, Pentax 135mm, Tamron 70-300 macro
Stuey
Posted 30/05/2011 - 22:36 Link
I really like number 4 even though it doesn't show the same grace as the others
K10D, K5 plus plenty of clueless enthusiasm.

My Flickr site link
i-Berg
Posted 31/05/2011 - 09:03 Link
Priceless expressions well captured with Nos 5 & 8.
thoughton
Posted 31/05/2011 - 09:53 Link
Oh, definitely 4 Birds in flight are a dime a dozen, birds that look incredibly foolish are much rarer It also sits nicely in the frame, some of the others feel a bit awkward, especially where you have cropped off wingtips.

I also like the mad expressions in 5 and 8.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
john941
Posted 31/05/2011 - 10:18 Link
Great set of shots jvs. You say you removed the uv filter from your lens. Did you notice any difference?
jvs
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:35 Link
Thanks to all for responding! I feel as if I'm beginning to make a little progress at last. For the record, the cropped off wingtips were unintended - the birds were too close to fit in the frame by the time I picked them up in focus.
And to reply to john941, yes, a huge difference! Shots went from focussed but dull to much sharper. There's a post of mine called Birds Eye Delight which has shots with the UV filter in place. The comments and discussion there made me take the filter off - and it was excellent advice!
John
Mike-P
Posted 31/05/2011 - 22:43 Link
Much better but I think you need to do a little bit more doctoring than just noise removal. For example Number 6 with just a quick bit of sharpening looks so much better to me.

[IMG]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v188/Sockpuppetuk/IMGP9361crop.jpg[/IMG]
Algernon
Posted 01/06/2011 - 09:34 Link
Interesting looking bird and well captured. Mike is
right about the sharpening It's made a big
difference
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber

Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff

Algi
jvs
Posted 01/06/2011 - 13:24 Link
I can see the difference made by Mike's sharpening, but I repeat that I'm a relative novice here and processing photos is a bit hit and miss until I get to know exactly a) what effects are needed and b) how to get them. So Mike, could you tell me just what you did in terms of sharpening, please? I've got access to PS Elements 7 and Corel Paintshop Pro X3. I don't know which is better, but the Corel seems a bit easier to use. If you point me in the right direction, I'll play around and see what I can come up with. Thanks.
John
Frogfish
Posted 01/06/2011 - 17:34 Link
#4,5,6,8,10 - all excellent shots !

#4 edges it over #5 only because the wing tips are missing !
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Mike-P
Posted 01/06/2011 - 17:40 Link
jvs wrote:
I can see the difference made by Mike's sharpening, but I repeat that I'm a relative novice here and processing photos is a bit hit and miss until I get to know exactly a) what effects are needed and b) how to get them. So Mike, could you tell me just what you did in terms of sharpening, please? I've got access to PS Elements 7 and Corel Paintshop Pro X3.
I use a plugin to do my sharpening with through Elements 9 but 7 must have some sort of option.

Enhance/adjust sharpness?
SteveEveritt
Posted 01/06/2011 - 18:58 Link
Lovely shots Vern, I also agree with Mike on the sharpening. Number 8 for me I love the expression on the gannet's face, I would crop the left side off to get rid of the blurred flower? it would give it a nice squared look and put the bird on the thirds. BTW what lens was it?
Flickr
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans" (John Lennon)

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo