Fog and snow
708 posts
Link
Posted 15/01/2021 - 11:18
Love the depth to the image with those dark shadows against the white featureless sky. With that nice lead in line of the track I'm undecided if I like the runners where they are or if I would of preferred them further to the right of the frame so the track didn't lead out of the frame but take you too them?
Gareth
Welsh Photographer
My outfit: K1 gripped - K3ii - two Z-1P - Pentax D FA 24-70mm - Sigma 70-200mm OS HSM - Pentax modified DA* 60-250mm f4 - Irix 15mm Firefly - Pentax FA 35mm - FA 50mm - Sigma EX 20mm - FA 28-70mm f4 - Tamron SP 90mm macro - Pentax AF 540 FGZ II
My Flickr
My PPG
Foundation NFT
Gareth
Welsh Photographer
My outfit: K1 gripped - K3ii - two Z-1P - Pentax D FA 24-70mm - Sigma 70-200mm OS HSM - Pentax modified DA* 60-250mm f4 - Irix 15mm Firefly - Pentax FA 35mm - FA 50mm - Sigma EX 20mm - FA 28-70mm f4 - Tamron SP 90mm macro - Pentax AF 540 FGZ II
My Flickr
My PPG
Foundation NFT
Link
Posted 15/01/2021 - 21:33
cardiffgareth wrote:
Love the depth to the image with those dark shadows against the white featureless sky. With that nice lead in line of the track I'm undecided if I like the runners where they are or if I would of preferred them further to the right of the frame so the track didn't lead out of the frame but take you too them?
Love the depth to the image with those dark shadows against the white featureless sky. With that nice lead in line of the track I'm undecided if I like the runners where they are or if I would of preferred them further to the right of the frame so the track didn't lead out of the frame but take you too them?
I see what you are getting at, and I think compositionally you are probably right. My only worry is that they would vanish even more into the fog! I did wait for them to be between trees so they would show-up against the fog.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
My website
Link
Posted 15/01/2021 - 23:40
I see what Gareth is getting at but further away the runners would be much less significant whereas as you have caught it they form the focus of the picture - visualise it without them and you see what I mean.
Last Edited by RobL on 15/01/2021 - 23:41
Link
Posted 16/01/2021 - 10:57
RobL wrote:
I see what Gareth is getting at but further away the runners would be much less significant whereas as you have caught it they form the focus of the picture - visualise it without them and you see what I mean.
I see what Gareth is getting at but further away the runners would be much less significant whereas as you have caught it they form the focus of the picture - visualise it without them and you see what I mean.
+1. There needs to be something to catch the eye between the LH tree and the clump on the right.
Steve
Link
Posted 17/01/2021 - 17:25
The comments on this image certainly confirm that small details can make quite a difference in the overall image. My mind's eye would be happy to see just the one bigger runner right where they are, but running in the opposite direction. 
But that's not how it happened, and the image is a fine one.
But that's not how it happened, and the image is a fine one.
Add a Comment
You must be registered or logged-in to comment.
womble
Plus Member
Hertfordshire, mostly.
foggy runners par Kris Lockyear, on ipernity
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
My website