Fisheye for Pentax

Posted 27/02/2014 - 20:04 Link
Here is an interesting thought to ponder.
The SMC-DA 10-17mm Fisheye zoom is currently £329.

On the other hand, if you get a Pentax Q10 with the 5-15mm and the Fisheye "toy" lens from SRS, you would pay £318.
So £11 less.

So what would you do?

Pro's of the 10-17
It is APS-C
It is a zoom (albeit) reducing the effect of a fisheye at 17mm
IQ will be better

Pro's of the Q
You would get another tiny body and a tiny zoom to enjoy
The fisheye is fixed focal length and F5.6 for 3.2mm EVERYTHING is in focus.
It is cheaper.

Now the downsides

10-17 -
CA is not that good
the HD version is surely on the horizon, which will possibly address the CA issue (maybe, maybe not)

Q bundle-
Sensor size = more noise over the APS-C at a given ISO
Another body, albeit tiny, to carry around. Then again it is probably the same size/weight as having the 10-17 anyway.
It's just a "toy" lens, so no aperture control and manual focus. But as it is so wide it really does not matter.
I already have a mighty Pano LX-5 for compact camera stuff.

So what would you do? I want a Fisheye but would not use it that much.....but having one would be ideal.
Some Cameras
CIBarker
Posted 27/02/2014 - 20:19 Link
If you think the Q route might be an option why not go for the original with 01 or 02 lens which can be bought around £100, even buying a toy fish eye it would be half the cost.
Posted 27/02/2014 - 20:27 Link
Interesting thought Chris. But is was thinking of the Q with the fisheye as an option, the zoom would be a bonus. Oh and I was thinking of new over pre-owned.
Having said that, the thought of an original Q with its metal body from the likes of fleabay and then getting a toy fisheye maybe even cheaper.
Some Cameras
matwhittington
Posted 27/02/2014 - 21:35 - Helpful Comment Link
I have the 10-17 fisheye and I adore it, in the right circumstances. I have had a go with the toy fisheye on the Q and was not that impressed… As I recall it did need a bit of effort focussing to deliver sharp results (although that was OK as long as the Q display was zoomed in), but to me it just wasn't 'fishy' enough (if that is an adjective). The 10-17 at 10mm is very cool to my eye, and whilst you're are right it does exhibit plenty of CA, especially at the edges and in high contrast scenes, I have generally found it pretty easy to get rid in post-processing. I just use PSE8 but newer packages with built-in lens profiles can probably remove it even more easily. Personally, for a real fishy effect I would go with the 10-17 every time I think (but maybe that's just me)

Of course, when you take into account the Q body and other lens as well… hmmm

Cheers
Mat W

My Flickr: link
kh1234567890
Posted 27/02/2014 - 23:50 Link
I think that the Samyang 8mm fisheye is better that the DA10-17 but that is another story. You could always try one of those front mounted converters. Or tape a door viewer thinggy onto the end of an extension tube ...
SteveF
Posted 01/03/2014 - 22:16 Link
I have the fisheye for the Q. It's manual focus and I find it difficult to focus accurately. It is also a toy lens, don't forget.
Posted 19/03/2014 - 19:24 Link
Well, in the end, I went for the 10-17mm. And Guess what, picked it up at lunch and walked around Manchester. I LOVE it......
Some Cameras
amilner
Posted 19/03/2014 - 22:22 Link
I'll just put in another plug for the the Samyang. It is surely going to outperform the Q combo. I like mine anyway!!
Tony Milner
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner
doingthebobs
Posted 19/03/2014 - 23:18 Link
Offertonhatter wrote:
Well, in the end, I went for the 10-17mm. And Guess what, picked it up at lunch and walked around Manchester. I LOVE it......
Not surprised you like it. You have to watch out for your feet though!

The 17 end is less fishy but I still find it useful, adding roundness to straight lines.
Bob
Posted 21/03/2014 - 20:00 Link
Here is one I took today, Love the colours at the Royal Exchange.
Comment Image
Some Cameras
jeffstclair
Posted 21/03/2014 - 20:19 Link
The royal exchange still takes my breath away after all these years ... great shot of a stunning building and remarkable theatre .....jeff...

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo