Fast Picture Viewer
Posted 26/09/2009 - 14:49
Link
You can download the Pentax & Adobe codecs for free direct from their websites, but they only work on 32 bit systems.
This set of codecs appear to be 3rd party ones, I've just installed them & they work on 64 bit too !
Thanks for posting the link lidy, as I've had to remember to manually start a 32bit explorer window up until now !
This set of codecs appear to be 3rd party ones, I've just installed them & they work on 64 bit too !
Thanks for posting the link lidy, as I've had to remember to manually start a 32bit explorer window up until now !
Posted 26/09/2009 - 21:57
Link
Glad it's of use to you!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships. - Ansel Adams -
Posted 26/09/2009 - 23:40
Link
Works great on XP, thanks!
Pentax K10d; Metz mecablitz 48 AF-1; Pentax A 50mm F2; Pentax 18-55mm DAII; Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-5.6; Koboron 24-70mm F3.5-4.8. Pentax MZ-7, Zenit 35mm
My Flickr Photos
My Flickr Photos
Posted 26/09/2009 - 23:55
Link
You can download from Microsoft Raw codecs that work in XP and Vista in Windows Explorer
Posted 27/09/2009 - 00:14
Link
Tried them, never worked in XP for me. There was a registry hack for getting the Microsoft codec pack to work in XP, but that never did for me either.
I used to use a different utility to do it, but lost that after my last reformat, and it was always a bit of a kludge. This just installs and works.
I used to use a different utility to do it, but lost that after my last reformat, and it was always a bit of a kludge. This just installs and works.
Pentax K10d; Metz mecablitz 48 AF-1; Pentax A 50mm F2; Pentax 18-55mm DAII; Sigma 28-300mm F3.5-5.6; Koboron 24-70mm F3.5-4.8. Pentax MZ-7, Zenit 35mm
My Flickr Photos
My Flickr Photos
Posted 27/09/2009 - 00:31
Link
jackitec wrote:
You can download from Microsoft Raw codecs that work in XP and Vista in Windows Explorer
http://www.microsoft.com/prophoto/downloads/codecs.aspx#pentax You can download from Microsoft Raw codecs that work in XP and Vista in Windows Explorer
Unfortunately not for 64bit
But the 64 bit codecs for this new viewer work like a charm. I've just purchased the Pro version and viewing of RAW files directly is great and extremely fast. Very impressed by this viewer package.
Posted 27/09/2009 - 12:43
Link
Thanks for that, it sure beets firing up adobe bridge for a browse
https://www.flickr.com/photos/carlosimagery/
http://twitter.com/foxycce
http://foxycce.ontheroad.to/carlo-does-thailand-tour
Karma is Just Cause and Effect - Do Good, Good will Happen
http://twitter.com/foxycce
http://foxycce.ontheroad.to/carlo-does-thailand-tour
Karma is Just Cause and Effect - Do Good, Good will Happen
Posted 27/09/2009 - 13:45
Link
Greytop - are you using XP64 or Vista 64?
Posted 27/09/2009 - 14:45
Link
organicimagery wrote:
Thanks for that, it sure beets firing up adobe bridge for a browse
Why use a post-processing program to view pictures? Irfanview and Faststone are the tools for this.Thanks for that, it sure beets firing up adobe bridge for a browse
Both free, and quick.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 27/09/2009 - 19:59
Link
Oggy wrote:
Greytop - are you using XP64 or Vista 64?
Vista 64 bitGreytop - are you using XP64 or Vista 64?
George Lazarette wrote:
Why use a post-processing program to view pictures? Irfanview and Faststone are the tools for this.
Both free, and quick.
G
For me it's being able to view untouched PEF files full screen in a fast viewer before editing in CaptureOne.
Why use a post-processing program to view pictures? Irfanview and Faststone are the tools for this.
Both free, and quick.
G
Posted 27/09/2009 - 22:13
Link
Thanks. How do you get on with it?
I am about to build a 64 bit machine but after all the bad things I have heard about Vista, I was thinking about XP64 or waiting for W7.
I am about to build a 64 bit machine but after all the bad things I have heard about Vista, I was thinking about XP64 or waiting for W7.
Posted 27/09/2009 - 22:37
Link
Oggy wrote:
I am about to build a 64 bit machine but after all the bad things I have heard about Vista, I was thinking about XP64 or waiting for W7.
I had XP64 and well it worked but there aren't a lot of drivers around for it so if you consider XP64 check if there are drivers for your hardware.I am about to build a 64 bit machine but after all the bad things I have heard about Vista, I was thinking about XP64 or waiting for W7.
I'm now using Win7 64 ultimate (build 7600) and it works good and better then xp64, I really like the interface of win7 and everything is working except the printer.
It's a canon ip4500 and only found out this morning so need to do some digging to find a solution.
Posted 27/09/2009 - 22:44
Link
Personally I'd opt for Windows 7. It's a fantastic OS with minimum requirements at less than Vista - it's been optimised so much better than Vista and demands less from your hardware.
It's as if they took the performance and reliability of XP and matched it with the swish-ness of Vista.
As you can probably tell, I love it.
It's as if they took the performance and reliability of XP and matched it with the swish-ness of Vista.
As you can probably tell, I love it.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



322 posts
16 years
Netherlands