FA 28mm f2.8 - any thoughts?
Posted 12/02/2010 - 19:04
Link
I have the earlier F 28mm F2.8 No complaints about the optical performance, but the build quality isn't great. Lots on cheap looking grey plastic, and the autofocus is a bit clunky. The later FA version looks better built.
No man is worth his salt, who has not been banned from at least one Forum, and two Flickr groups.
Mowog.
Mowog.
Posted 12/02/2010 - 20:25
Link
It's supposed to be less than stellar wide open, but very sharp stopped down. Its main weakness is apparently contrast, which doesn't quite reach the level of Pentax's other lenses. However contrast is something you can add in post-processing, and bear in mind that (since I do not own the lens myself) this is just my own inexpert summary of the Lens Reviews section of The Other Forum.
Posted 12/02/2010 - 21:20
Link
MrCynical wrote:
It's supposed to be less than stellar wide open
That's what I found with the copy I tried, too. The F version I settled on is sharper wide open. Same should apply to the A as it has the same optics as the F.
It's supposed to be less than stellar wide open
~Pete
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1569 posts
17 years
Victory Mansions
Doesn;t necessarily seem the most common lens (in terms of availability of used examples), but as a standard prime is it worth acquiring for a reasonable price?
Apparently.