FA 100-300mm
Posted 11/09/2026 - 16:12
Link
These look very nice, especially the background blur in the first one. I have an 80-320mm that does not see the light of day. Inspired to try it out now.
Posted 11/09/2026 - 18:13
Link
Pleasing images...very good value on the face of it with the K-1.
Posted 11/09/2026 - 23:52
Link
The 80 - 320 is a very capable lens. I wouldn't part with mine.
Posted 12/09/2026 - 10:03
Link
davidwozhere wrote:
The 80 - 320 is a very capable lens. I wouldn't part with mine.
Aaaagh!!! Why do you tempt me thus?? Surely I have too many lenses already and need no more ... Begone, foul spirit of temptation .The 80 - 320 is a very capable lens. I wouldn't part with mine.
Steve
Posted 12/09/2026 - 11:08
Link
Yes I've found that the 80-320 is pretty nice except at the extreme of the telephoto end which is soft.
Posted 12/09/2026 - 12:35
Link
1stEverPentax wrote:
Pleasing images...very good value on the face of it with the K-1.
+ 1 They look ok to me on the monitor, were they SOOC ? and if so you could apply some sharpening in PP and then job done, got a bargain as is though.
Pleasing images...very good value on the face of it with the K-1.
Posted 12/09/2026 - 12:44
Link
A wide-range zoom is good to have. I use a K-70, bought in part because I could start with just the body and my K-1000 glass. My first new lens was my smc Pentax-DA 18-270mm. I bought it for its wide focal range to handle a variety of situations. After more than eight years (and three other lens purchases) it remains my #2 lens, behind my smc Pentax-FA 35mm, because of its versatility.
Dale H. Cook, Pentax K-70, Pentax DA 35mm, Pentax-D FA Macro 100mm, Pentax-DA 12-24mm,
Pentax DA 18-270mm; Mamiya/Sekor 400mm; Rokinon 650Z 650-1300mm
https://plymouthcolony.net/photos/index.html
Pentax DA 18-270mm; Mamiya/Sekor 400mm; Rokinon 650Z 650-1300mm
https://plymouthcolony.net/photos/index.html
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


3000 posts
18 years
South Dorset
Well, it's a light weight (good!), plastic, slow, no frills thing with zoom creep that must have been designed before ergonomics was invented. But I took it on a dog walk, than another walk, and another... And I must admit that once I got used to handling it the lens started to grow on me. Here are a few shots from those early walks.
1. At 135mm
2. At 210mm
3. At 300mm
I don't remember seeing much mention of the lens on this forum. However, as far as I'm concerned, it was £50 well spent and the FA 100-300mm is here to stay. And if something a bit more sophisticated is needed, the Sigma 100-300mm f4 and DA* 300mm f4 are also on the lens shelf. But they are really not lenses for taking on walks with one hand holding the camera and the other hand holding a lead with a big dog on the end!
Steve