EOS 600D and Pentax K-r image comparison
Posted 10/03/2011 - 16:13
Link
You can compare it to the K-5 and others too
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 10/03/2011 - 18:08
Link
I have my suspicions about this test. The Canon looks sharper, but the Pentax doesn't look in focus and at f/9 that takes some doing
Against the K-5 it's the same?
The Exif according to Photome does not recognise the lens on the Pentax, so I suspect it's a 50mm f/2.8 Sigma
Against the K-5 it's the same?
The Exif according to Photome does not recognise the lens on the Pentax, so I suspect it's a 50mm f/2.8 Sigma
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 10/03/2011 - 18:10
Link
It's quite good, isn't it? Holds up well against the K5 IQ wise, and noticeably outresolves the Kr. Based on this test, this camera would seriously sway me from the Kr, if I was looking for an entry level camera. I like the swivel screen.
I hope swivel screens come to Pentax DSLRs at some stage.
I hope swivel screens come to Pentax DSLRs at some stage.
Posted 10/03/2011 - 18:19
Link
Comparisons are really difficult with DSLRs because the result depends so much on how the camera is set up. There's the default settings as supplied, but apart from that all of them can be altered to taste quite extensively.
So should each one be fine tuned, and to what standards? Even the RAW output from each will be different.
So should each one be fine tuned, and to what standards? Even the RAW output from each will be different.
Best regards, John
Posted 10/03/2011 - 18:29
Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
It's quite good, isn't it? Holds up well against the K5 IQ wise, and noticeably outresolves the Kr.
If you download the JPG's and look through a viewer that allows compare such as Farstone the Canon is way sharper than the K-5 It's quite good, isn't it? Holds up well against the K5 IQ wise, and noticeably outresolves the Kr.
The trouble is Pentax don't really have a standard lens suitable to do this kind of test, unless the 50mm f/2.8 Macro is still available? The 50mm FA f/1.4 isn't the sharpest chisel in the toolbox
The test should also be done at f/5.6 these kind of lenses (apart from the macro fall off at f/8 )
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 10/03/2011 - 19:08
Link
They should use a sigma 50mm that one is available for all brands i believe so you take one random thing out of the equation.
Posted 10/03/2011 - 19:46
Link
Anvh wrote:
They should use a sigma 50mm that one is available for all brands i believe so you take one random thing out of the equation.
I think Imaging Resource use the Sigma 70mm Macro on all their camera tests. They don't seem to have done the 600D yet. They also take several shots to get the best focus.
They should use a sigma 50mm that one is available for all brands i believe so you take one random thing out of the equation.
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



6416 posts
17 years
link
Best regards