Engadget Q review
Posted 31/10/2011 - 18:33
Link
Yes Engadget's reviews are normally quite pointless, not just their cameras ones which are almost unreadable but their phone ones as well. I thought they didn't get the point of the Q at all and just kept one negative comment after the other just because they cannot do a decent review.
In any case as I have stated over here before the Q is a whole different type of camera, it does not fit with the norm that everybody tries to compare it with. Yes for a niche product is quite expensive but it is a niche product and it deserves to be reviewed by someone like that.
The Nikon 1 though is a rather pointless product.
In any case as I have stated over here before the Q is a whole different type of camera, it does not fit with the norm that everybody tries to compare it with. Yes for a niche product is quite expensive but it is a niche product and it deserves to be reviewed by someone like that.
The Nikon 1 though is a rather pointless product.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
1172 posts
17 years
UK
Kai's Pentax Q review on DigitalRev TV: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ea_bmxRoic
It's not as slating as you might have expected, although of course he's all over the Q's failings like an angry moss.
I think he did hit the nail on the head though. Yes it is cute, has good IQ considering its sensor size, but has some lag, and a complete lack of DOF control. But, like all of us have said, it is currently too expensive for what it is.
Actually if you look at today's DigitalRev vid, the Pentax came off rather well in comparison to the Nikon V1.....
Endgaget on the other hand were just scathing for scathings sake.