Dunino Den
Posted 02/02/2010 - 17:44
Link
The last one is clearly the best! The first one doesn't do anything for me, the others could be (IMHO as always) be improved by a little cropping, e.g., the second one could loose a bit of the OOF highlights to the left.
Best wishes, Kris.
Best wishes, Kris.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 02/02/2010 - 17:50
Link
Then last one is as you say terrific but the blown out sky does it no favours The figure does give it a real boost. The focus isn't quite right though IMO - good to be on rock but it seems a little muddled.
Number three for me with some extra PP to give it more bite and rein in the background. But is it in focus, really in focus and is it sharp?
Mike
Number three for me with some extra PP to give it more bite and rein in the background. But is it in focus, really in focus and is it sharp?
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 02/02/2010 - 18:07
Link
Hi thanks for the comments. Had a fair bit of trouble sorting highlights and blown out areas in a few photos from that day, something i need to be aware of in future. Unfortunatly i dont think No.3 is in focus, i was getting ahead oh myself and dont think i was letting the SR sort itself out before shooting.. real shame.
Thanks again
Fraser
Thanks again
Fraser
Posted 02/02/2010 - 18:12
Link
The histogram is your friend!
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 02/02/2010 - 21:18
Link
Do you mean five? Yes, I guess the range would have been too much unless you used a little bit of fill-in flash and that would be difficult to get looking natural. One might compromise and allow some burning out of the highlights then bringing up the foreground in PP. Not sure how many times that young lady would be prepared to scamper up and down the stairs though while one tried to get it technically correct. As it is, despite its technical imperfections, I rather like it
My comment was intended to be more general, i.e., use the histogram to avoid burnt out highlights (and at least you can quickly see when the dynamic range is too large for the sensor).
Best wishes, K.
My comment was intended to be more general, i.e., use the histogram to avoid burnt out highlights (and at least you can quickly see when the dynamic range is too large for the sensor).
Best wishes, K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 02/02/2010 - 22:13
Link
I did mean the last one of course. I suspect that the stone face would take some underexposure and then a boost in PP, being a bit darker might make it more intense and the under exposure ought to help with the sky. I'm sure our man has a silver tongue and would be able to persuade the young lady to scamper up and down the steps a few times (provided he didn't mention she would be but a blur)
Mike
Mike
---------------------------------------------------
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
You can see some of my shots at my Flickr account.
Posted 02/02/2010 - 22:15
Link
I think you're right. The grainy nature of the rock face would probably cope with a little bit of noise. I wonder what a BW conversion would look like?
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 02/02/2010 - 22:33
Link
Hi, glad this has sparked a bit of interest. Have just started using lightroom so still getting used to it. Had a go at correcting the highlights with little success, will have a try at B/W in a bit
Posted 02/02/2010 - 22:54
Link
Posted 03/02/2010 - 09:06
Link
Hi, glad this has sparked a bit of interest. Have just started using lightroom so still getting used to it. Had a go at correcting the highlights with little success, will have a try at B/W in a bit
Posted 03/02/2010 - 09:45
Link
I prefer the original. Great composition - just a shame about the blown sky and focusing, as Mike says (though I think the latter's more serious - one's allowed to blow a sky every so often as long as it's incidental to the main subject:wink.
Not so keen on the others. You don't quite pull it off in these. But at the very least they're all interesting. Keep on experimenting, I say.
Not so keen on the others. You don't quite pull it off in these. But at the very least they're all interesting. Keep on experimenting, I say.
Posted 03/02/2010 - 10:11
Link
Dr. Mhuni wrote:
But at the very least they're all interesting. Keep on experimenting, I say.
I agree whole-heartedly. You clearly have a good eye for unusual angles and compositions which is worth cultivating. K.
But at the very least they're all interesting. Keep on experimenting, I say.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



37 posts
19 years
St.Andrews
Dunino den is a small celtic site about 5miles from my uni. The site is covered in carvings in the trees and stones and has a strange eery quality to it. Def. worth a visit to anyone in the fife area.
Here are a few pics, comments and criticism welcome, (exexpt for the last one, which i really like )
[IMG]http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/fra-zzr-albums-dunino-den-picture1971-imgp2430-edit.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/fra-zzr-albums-dunino-den-picture1970-imgp2386.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/fra-zzr-albums-dunino-den-picture1969-imgp2382-edit.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/fra-zzr-albums-dunino-den-picture1968-imgp2368.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/members/fra-zzr-albums-dunino-den-picture1967-imgp2347.jpg[/IMG]