DPR K-01 review
Posted 31/05/2012 - 10:12
Link
Very interesting review, many thanks for posting the link.
Best regards, John
Posted 31/05/2012 - 12:58
Link
It is interesting.
The comments on poor Pentax QC did give me a bit of a 'Groundhog Day' feeling
Despite the inevitable cries of 'but all brands have QC problems' from some, the fact is that Pentax is much smaller than the rest, and can't afford to brush off such criticisms lightly.
Credit to the reviewer, though - he clearly didn't let what must have been very frustrating QC issues cast a negative slant on the review itself.
The comments on poor Pentax QC did give me a bit of a 'Groundhog Day' feeling
Despite the inevitable cries of 'but all brands have QC problems' from some, the fact is that Pentax is much smaller than the rest, and can't afford to brush off such criticisms lightly.
Credit to the reviewer, though - he clearly didn't let what must have been very frustrating QC issues cast a negative slant on the review itself.
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Pentax K-3, DA18-135, DA35 F2.4, DA17-70, DA55-300, FA28-200, A50 F1.7, A100 F4 Macro, A400 F5.6, Sigma 10-20 EXDC, 50-500 F4.5-6.3 APO DG OS Samsung flash SEF-54PZF(x2)
.
Posted 31/05/2012 - 13:11
Link
As a generality, I've noticed that quite a few marques have issues from time to time. I've been lucky so far, but it does go to show that it's worth checking new kit carefully and rejecting anything sub-standard within the first few days if at all possible. No arguments that way.
Best regards, John
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
418 posts
22 years
Dorking,
England
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner